Literature DB >> 23415818

Early clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Korean population.

Jong-Hun Ji1, Jin-Young Jeong, Hyun-Seok Song, Ji-Hoon Ok, Seok-Jo Yang, Byung-Kwan Jeon, Tae-Gyun Kim, Young-Seok Moon, Yang-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the short-term clinical outcomes and compared the component's sizes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in Korean Population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an RTSA on 42 patients between December 2007 to February 2010. The mean age at surgery was 72.5 ± 5.6 (10 men, 32 women) and average follow-up period was 24 months. Twenty-two cuff tears arthropathy, 15 irreparable massive rotator cuff tears with pseudoparalysis, 5 proximal humeral fractures, and 2 infection cases were included. We evaluated clinical outcomes and also the intra- and postoperative complications to determine if any of the complications were unique to the use of a RTSA in a Korean population. In the anatomic study, 92 uninjured shoulders of 92 patients were used for measuring the inferior glenoid size, and we compared the component's sizes of RTSA with those of the normal population.
RESULTS: The ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow), UCLA, and KS (Knee Society) scores significantly improved from preoperative 35 (0-63), 12 (5-27), and 39 (3-81) to postoperative 68 (37-95), 24 (16-35), and 68 (34-88), respectively (P < .05). Postoperative complications were seen in 20% and scapular notching 35%. Three patients required further surgery for shoulder dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and stem loosening. In the anatomic study, mean radius of the inferior glenoid was 17.1 ± 2.1 mm in male and 15.4 ± 1.6 mm in female.
CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical results of an RTSA in Korean population are excellent despite high complication rate. However, the size of the glenoid is sometimes smaller than the baseplate (29 mm diameter) in female patients. More adequate size of the glenoid component should be considered.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case Series; Korean population; Level IV; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Treatment Study; complications; glenoid size

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415818     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  18 in total

1.  Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a mini 25-mm glenoid baseplate.

Authors:  George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic humeral fractures associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: incidence and management.

Authors:  Carlos García-Fernández; Yaiza Lópiz-Morales; Alberto Rodríguez; Luis López-Durán; Fernando Marco Martínez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: The Singapore General Hospital experience and a simple method of measuring change in the center-of-rotation.

Authors:  Chay-You Ang; Kah-Weng Lai; Denny Lie Tjiauw Tjoen; Paul Chang Chee Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-06-10

Review 4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Petrillo; U G Longo; R Papalia; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

5.  Glenoid morphology and the safe zone for protecting the suprascapular nerve during baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuhui Yang; Jianlin Zuo; Tong Liu; Pu Shao; Haihe Wu; Zhongli Gao; Jianlin Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph J King; Kevin W Farmer; Aimee M Struk; Thomas W Wright
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study.

Authors:  F A de Boer; P M van Kampen; P E Huijsmans
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-03

Review 8.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review.

Authors:  U G Longo; S Petrillo; A Berton; V Denaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-17

9.  3D CT scan-based study of glenoid morphology in Indian population: Clinical relevance in design of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prashant Meshram; Aditya Pawaskar; Aashay Kekatpure
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03-06

10.  The study of 2-dimensional computed tomography scans of the glenoid anatomy in relation to reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the Southern Chinese population.

Authors:  Amanda Mun Yee Slocum; Yuk Chuen Siu; Chun Man Ma; Tun Hing Lui
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.