OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the workday step counts of lower active (<10,000 daily steps) university employees using an automated, web-based walking intervention (Walk@Work). METHODS: Academic and administrative staff (n=390; 45.6±10.8years; BMI 27.2±5.5kg/m(2); 290 women) at five campuses (Australia [x2], Canada, Northern Ireland and the United States), were given a pedometer, access to the website program (2010-11) and tasked with increasing workday walking by 1000 daily steps above baseline, every two weeks, over a six week period. Step count changes at four weeks post intervention were evaluated relative to campus and baseline walking. RESULTS: Across the sample, step counts significantly increased from baseline to post-intervention (1477 daily steps; p=0.001). Variations in increases were evident between campuses (largest difference of 870 daily steps; p=0.04) and for baseline activity status. Those least active at baseline (<5000 daily steps; n=125) increased step counts the most (1837 daily steps; p=0.001), whereas those most active (7500-9999 daily steps; n=79) increased the least (929 daily steps; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Walk@Work increased workday walking by 25% in this sample overall. Increases occurred through an automated program, at campuses in different countries, and were most evident for those most in need of intervention.
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the workday step counts of lower active (<10,000 daily steps) university employees using an automated, web-based walking intervention (Walk@Work). METHODS: Academic and administrative staff (n=390; 45.6±10.8years; BMI 27.2±5.5kg/m(2); 290 women) at five campuses (Australia [x2], Canada, Northern Ireland and the United States), were given a pedometer, access to the website program (2010-11) and tasked with increasing workday walking by 1000 daily steps above baseline, every two weeks, over a six week period. Step count changes at four weeks post intervention were evaluated relative to campus and baseline walking. RESULTS: Across the sample, step counts significantly increased from baseline to post-intervention (1477 daily steps; p=0.001). Variations in increases were evident between campuses (largest difference of 870 daily steps; p=0.04) and for baseline activity status. Those least active at baseline (<5000 daily steps; n=125) increased step counts the most (1837 daily steps; p=0.001), whereas those most active (7500-9999 daily steps; n=79) increased the least (929 daily steps; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Walk@Work increased workday walking by 25% in this sample overall. Increases occurred through an automated program, at campuses in different countries, and were most evident for those most in need of intervention.
Authors: Judit Bort-Roig; Nicholas D Gilson; Anna Puig-Ribera; Ruth S Contreras; Stewart G Trost Journal: Sports Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Cheryl L Albright; Alana D Steffen; Lynne R Wilkens; Kami K White; Rachel Novotny; Claudio R Nigg; Kara Saiki; Wendy J Brown Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Anna Puig-Ribera; Judit Bort-Roig; Angel M González-Suárez; Iván Martínez-Lemos; Maria Giné-Garriga; Josep Fortuño; Joan C Martori; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Raimon Milà; Jim McKenna; Nicholas D Gilson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Linda Trinh; Kelly P Arbour-Nicitopoulos; Catherine M Sabiston; Scott R Berry; Andrew Loblaw; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Jennifer M Jones; Guy E Faulkner Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Behrang Assemi; Renee Zahnow; Belen Zapata-Diomedi; Mark Hickman; Jonathan Corcoran Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Judit Bort-Roig; Emilia Chirveches-Pérez; Maria Giné-Garriga; Lydia Navarro-Blasco; Roser Bausà-Peris; Pedro Iturrioz-Rosell; Angel M González-Suárez; Iván Martínez-Lemos; Emma Puigoriol-Juvanteny; Kieran Dowd; Anna Puig-Ribera Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Judit Bort-Roig; Montserrat Martin; Anna Puig-Ribera; Ángel Manuel González-Suárez; Iván Martínez-Lemos; Joan Carles Martori; Nicholas D Gilson Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Charlotte L Brakenridge; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Duncan C Young; Elisabeth A H Winkler; David W Dunstan; Leon M Straker; Christian J Brakenridge; Genevieve N Healy Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-05-25