Literature DB >> 23415572

Surgical duration of cochlear implantation in an academic university-based practice.

Maroun T Semaan1, Elisha T Fredman, Jay R Shah, Souha A Fares, Gail S Murray, Cliff A Megerian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Establish the time to safely and efficiently perform cochlear implantation (CI) in a university-based academic center. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Academic neurotologic referral center. PATIENTS: 424 patients who underwent CI surgery between 2002 and 2010. INTERVENTION: Unilateral, bilateral or revision CI using commercially available devices approved for use in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: mean surgical duration (SD) and mean total operative room time (TORT).
RESULTS: Overall mean SD for all 424 patients was 83 ± 30 min (min) whereas the mean TORT was 135 ± 56 min. The mean SD for unilateral CI was 84 ± 18 min for the first implant and 82 ± 22 min for the second implant (p=0.55). The SD for primary and revision CI was 83 ± 18 min and 85 ± 36 min, respectively (p=0.51). The mean SD for pediatric and adult CI was 83 ± 21 min and 83 ± 18 min, respectively (p=0.92). The mean SD without resident assistance was 74 ± 14 min whereas with the assistance of a resident the mean SD was 84 ± 20 min (p=0.02). When ossification was encountered the mean SD was 90 ± 32 min compared to 82 ± 19 min when absent (p<0.001). An association was found between TORT or SD, and the year of surgery, presence of ossification and the involvement of an assistant.
CONCLUSION: In a university-based academic center, CI surgery can be safely and efficiently performed, supporting future cost-effectiveness analysis of its current practice. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415572     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  6 in total

1.  Influence of trainee participation on operative times for adult and pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Sidharth V Puram; Elliott D Kozin; Rosh Kv Sethi; Ariel E Hight; Mark G Shrime; Stacey T Gray; Michael S Cohen; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-11-11

2.  Association of the Duration of Antibiotic Therapy With Major Surgical Site Infection in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Achraf Sayed-Hassan; Ruben Hermann; Frédéric Chidiac; Eric Truy; Nicolas Guevara; Sonanda Bailleux; Olivier Deguine; Blandine Baladi; Yohan Gallois; Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli; Yannick Lerosey; Benoit Godey; Cécile Parietti-Winkler; Bruno Pereira; Thierry Mom
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Minimally invasive image-guided cochlear implantation surgery: first report of clinical implementation.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Ramya Balachandran; Jack H Noble; Grégoire S Blachon; Jason E Mitchell; Fitsum A Reda; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation Assisted by Bi-planar Device: An Exploratory Feasibility Study in vitro.

Authors:  Jia Ke; Shao-Xing Zhang; Lei Hu; Chang-Sheng Li; Yun-Feng Zhu; Shi-Long Sun; Li-Feng Wang; Fu-Rong Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Image-guided cochlear access by non-invasive registration: a cadaveric feasibility study.

Authors:  Jiang Wang; Hongsheng Liu; Jia Ke; Lei Hu; Shaoxing Zhang; Biao Yang; Shilong Sun; Na Guo; Furong Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Time Flow Study to Assess Opportunities to Improve Efficiency in Endoscopic Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Arushri Swarup; Nichtima Chayaopas; Kyle W Eastwood; Adrian James
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.017

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.