Literature DB >> 23415517

Influence of casein on flux and passage of serum proteins during microfiltration using polymeric spiral-wound membranes at 50°C.

Justyna Zulewska1, David M Barbano2.   

Abstract

Raw milk (approximately 1,800 kg) was separated at 4°C, pasteurized (at 72°C for 16s), and split into 2 batches. One batch (620 kg) was microfiltered (MF) using pilot-scale ceramic uniform transmembrane pressure Membralox membranes (model EP1940GL0.1 μA, 0.1-μm alumina; Pall Corp., East Hills, NY) to produce retentate and permeate. The permeate from the MF uniform transmembrane pressure was casein-free skim milk (CFSM). The CFSM was MF using polymeric spiral-wound (SW) membranes (model FG7838-OS0x-S, 0.3 μm; Parker-Hannifin Corp., Process Advanced Filtration Division, Tell City, IN) at a concentration factor of 3× and temperature of 50°C. Following the processing of CFSM, the second batch of skim milk (1,105 kg) was processed using the same polymeric membranes to determine how casein content in the feed material for MF with polymeric membranes affects the performance of the system. There was little resistance to passage of milk serum proteins (SP) through a 0.3-μm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) SW membrane at 50°C and no detectable increase in hydraulic resistance of the membrane when processing CFSM. Therefore, milk SP contributed little, if any, to fouling of the PVDF membrane. In contrast, when processing skim milk containing a normal concentration of casein, the flux was much lower than when processing CFSM (17.2 vs. 80.2 kg/m(2) per hour, respectively) and the removal of SP from skim milk with a single-pass 3× bleed-and-feed MF system was also much lower than from CFSM (35.2 vs. 59.5% removal, respectively). Thus, when processing skim milk with a PVDF SW membrane, casein was the major protein foulant that increased hydraulic resistance and reduced passage of SP through the membrane.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415517     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Protein Preparations as Ingredients for the Enrichment of Non-Fermented Milks.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kiełczewska; Aneta Dąbrowska; Marika Magdalena Bielecka; Bogdan Dec; Maria Baranowska; Justyna Ziajka; Yang Zhennai; Justyna Żulewska
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Comparative Assessment of Tubular Ceramic, Spiral Wound, and Hollow Fiber Membrane Microfiltration Module Systems for Milk Protein Fractionation.

Authors:  Roland Schopf; Florian Schmidt; Johanna Linner; Ulrich Kulozik
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-24

3.  Influence of Transglutaminase Crosslinking on Casein Protein Fractionation during Low Temperature Microfiltration.

Authors:  Ritika Puri; Francesca Bot; Upendra Singh; James A O'Mahony
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.