Literature DB >> 23415314

Combining neurohormonal blockade with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support for myocardial recovery: a single-arm prospective study.

Snehal R Patel1, Omar Saeed, Sandhya Murthy, Vivek Bhatia, Jooyoung J Shin, Dan Wang, Abdissa Negassa, James Pullman, Daniel J Goldstein, Simon Maybaum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combining mechanical unloading by a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) and neurohormonal blockade with heart failure medications (HFMED) is an underexplored clinical strategy to promote recovery of cardiac function in patients with advanced heart failure (HF).
METHODS: We implemented a clinical protocol to achieve maximal neurohormonal blockade after placement of a CF-LVAD and assessed its utility in an LVAD weaning (6,200 rpm) study. Thirty-four subjects were enrolled after CF-LVAD and were managed with aggressive, bi-weekly up-titration of HFMED.
RESULTS: Twenty-one subjects (8 with coronary artery disease, 13 with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy) were included in this LVAD weaning investigation. Overall, combined CF-LVAD and HFMED resulted in significant reverse remodeling with a decrease in left atrial volume index (44.7±16.0 to 31.6±12.1 ml/m(2), p < 0.001) and LV internal diastolic diameter (6.7±1.5 to 6.0±1.6 cm, p = 0.003) and an increase in LV ejection fraction (17.4±6.5 to 33.1±16.2%, p < 0.001) during LVAD weaning (6,200 rpm). Five of 21 (24%) subjects demonstrated recovery of biventricular function. Exploratory analysis showed that recovered subjects had shorter duration HF, less myocardial fibrosis and less myocyte hypertrophy, and were supported at higher LVAD speeds.
CONCLUSIONS: CF-LVAD support in combination with HFMED leads to significant reverse remodeling in patients with advanced HF. Using this approach, one quarter of patients demonstrated complete recovery of cardiac function. Our results suggest that bridge to recovery in the current device era is a clinically meaningful phenomenon and merits further investigation.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415314     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  18 in total

1.  Myocardial Recovery in Patients Receiving Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Results From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).

Authors:  Veli K Topkara; A Reshad Garan; Barry Fine; Amandine F Godier-Furnémont; Alexander Breskin; Barbara Cagliostro; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Donna M Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Preoperative beta-blocker treatment is a key for deciding left ventricular assist device implantation strategy as a bridge to recovery.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Koichiro Kinugawa; Masaru Hatano; Takeo Fujino; Hironori Muraoka; Toshiro Inaba; Hisataka Maki; Yukie Kagami; Miyoko Endo; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Benefits of Neurohormonal Therapy in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Rayan Yousefzai; Michela Brambatti; Hao A Tran; Rachel Pedersen; Oscar Ö Braun; Tina Baykaner; Roxana Ghashghaei; Nasir Z Sulemanjee; Omar M Cheema; Matthew Rappelt; Carmela Baeza; Abdulaziz Alkhayyat; Yang Shi; Victor Pretorius; Barry Greenberg; Eric Adler; Vinay Thohan
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Advancing the Science of Myocardial Recovery with Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Working Group of the National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Francis D Pagani; Martha S Lundberg; J Timothy Baldwin
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Successful weaning from the DuraHeart with a low left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Mitsutoshi Kimura; Osamu Kinoshita; Takashi Nishimura; Teruhiko Imamura; Taro Shiga; Koichi Kashiwa; Koichiro Kinugawa; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Thyroid hormone signalling is altered in response to physical training in patients with end-stage heart failure and mechanical assist devices: potential physiological consequences?

Authors:  Stamatios Adamopoulos; Aggeliki Gouziouta; Polixeni Mantzouratou; Ioannis D Laoutaris; Athanasios Dritsas; Dennis V Cokkinos; Iordanis Mourouzis; Petros Sfyrakis; Giorgio Iervasi; Constantinos Pantos
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-02

Review 7.  Bridge to removal: a paradigm shift for left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Craig H Selzman; Jesse L Madden; Aaron H Healy; Stephen H McKellar; Antigone Koliopoulou; Josef Stehlik; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  The Effect of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Cardiac Biomarkers: Implications for the Identification of Myocardial Recovery.

Authors:  Luise Holzhauser; Gene Kim; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-08

Review 9.  Expanding the Scope of Multimodality Imaging in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18

10.  Treatment strategies for myocardial recovery in heart failure.

Authors:  Andrew J Lenneman; Emma J Birks
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.