Literature DB >> 23415074

Similar clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis with more versus less expensive treatment strategies. Observational data from two rheumatology clinics.

Tuulikki Sokka1, Glenn Haugeberg, Juha Asikainen, Inger Johanne Widding Hansen, Arto Kokko, Tuomas Rannio, Dag Magnar Soldal, Pekka Hannonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Selection of efficacious medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has tremendously increased over a decade including new costly biologic agents and inexpensive conventional anti-rheumatic drugs, used in combinations for more efficacy. Treatments aim at remission or at least low disease activity. Our objective was to study whether treatment target is reached and to what cost, in patients with RA in two Nordic rheumatology clinics.
METHODS: Cross sectional observational clinical data of all patients with RA seen in 2010 in two Nordic county hospital rheumatology units: Kristiansand, Norway and Jyväskylä, Finland, which both serve a population of about 275,000. Measures included patient demographic measures, clinical characteristics, disease activity, functional status, and treatments. Annual costs of medications to the society were calculated per 100 patients, using an assumption that a patient is taking current medications for one year.
RESULTS: Patient populations from Kristiansand and Jyväskylä were similar according to age, gender, disease duration, and prevalence of RF and CCP. Disease activity was low and patients' functional status well reserved in both clinics. Almost twice as many patients in Kristiansand than in Jyväskylä (33% vs. 17%) used biologic agents. A combination of conventional anti-rheumatic drugs was currently used by <1% of patients in Kristiansand and by 37% of patients in Jyväskylä. Estimated annual costs of medications per 100 patients were €508,000 in Kristiansand and €280,000 in Jyväskylä.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment target of remission/low disease activity and good functional status can be reached in RA using expensive and less-expensive anti-rheumatic drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol        ISSN: 0392-856X            Impact factor:   4.473


  15 in total

1.  Synovial fluid detection in intra-articular injections using a bioimpedance probe (BIP) needle-a clinical study.

Authors:  Sanna Halonen; Eeva Kankaanpää; Juho Kari; Pinja Parmanne; Heikki Relas; Kai Kronström; Riitta Luosujärvi; Ritva Peltomaa
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Setting the research agenda for improving health care in musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Chris Maher; Ian A Harris
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Real-world cost-effectiveness of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients: results of the CREATE registry.

Authors:  M Cárdenas; S de la Fuente; P Font; M C Castro-Villegas; M Romero-Gómez; D Ruiz-Vílchez; J Calvo-Gutiérez; A Escudero-Contreras; M A Casado; J R Del Prado; E Collantes-Estévez
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Treatment strategies are more important than drugs in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexandros A Drosos; Eleftherios Pelechas; Paraskevi V Voulgari
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  A comparison of disease burden in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Brigitte Michelsen; Ragnhild Fiane; Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Dag Magnar Soldal; Inger Johanne W Hansen; Tuulikki Sokka; Arthur Kavanaugh; Glenn Haugeberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ten years of change in clinical disease status and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: results based on standardized monitoring of patients in an ordinary outpatient clinic in southern Norway.

Authors:  Glenn Haugeberg; Inger Johanne Widding Hansen; Dag Magnar Soldal; Tuulikki Sokka
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Serum survivin predicts responses to treatment in active rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis from the SWEFOT trial.

Authors:  Adrian Levitsky; Malin C Erlandsson; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Maria I Bokarewa
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Evolution of cost structures in rheumatoid arthritis over the past decade.

Authors:  Dörte Huscher; Thomas Mittendorf; Ulrich von Hinüber; Ina Kötter; Guido Hoese; Andrea Pfäfflin; Sascha Bischoff; Angela Zink
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Factors influencing rheumatologists' prescription of biological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: an interview study.

Authors:  Almina Kalkan; Kerstin Roback; Eva Hallert; Per Carlsson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Changes and sex differences in patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid factor positive RA-results from a community based study.

Authors:  Korosh Hekmat; Lennart T Jacobsson; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Ylva Lindroth; Carl Turesson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.