Literature DB >> 23415022

Two-year outcomes for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Pablo Codner1, Abid Assali, Danny Dvir, Hana Vaknin-Assa, Eyal Porat, Yaron Shapira, Marina Kupershmidt, Tamir Bental, Alexander Battler, Alexander Sagie, Ran Kornowski.   

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging technique for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Little has been reported about the use of different devices and multiple catheter-based options and anesthetic techniques in the same institution. We report the long-term clinical experience in treating patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis using TAVI. We analyzed the outcomes of 153 TAVI-treated patients who were followed for ≤2 years. All patients were at very high risk of surgical valve replacement. The Medtronic-CoreValve device was used in 59.5% and the Edwards-SAPIEN device in 40.5% of the patients. The primary end point was death from any cause during follow-up. The mean ± SD patient age was 81.1 ± 6 years, and 62% of the patients were women. The procedural success rate was 97.4%. At 30 days of follow-up, the all-cause mortality was 3.9%. Two-year follow-up data were obtained for 108 patients, with 85.5% survival of treated patients. The 30-day stroke rate was 3.9%. No significant differences in mortality were found when angioplasty was performed before or during TAVI compared with TAVI alone. Multivariate analysis showed that increased baseline creatinine (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.42, p = 0.049) and increased logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.06, p = 0.048) predicted all-cause mortality. In conclusion, the clinical outcome of TAVI is favorable. The use of both procedural devices and multiple techniques in the same institution is feasible and potentially desirable.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415022     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?

Authors:  Davide Cao; Mauro Chiarito; Paolo Pagnotta; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

Review 2.  Efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic stenosis and reduced LVEF. A systematic review.

Authors:  X Luo; Z Zhao; H Chai; C Zhang; Y Liao; Q Li; Y Peng; W Liu; X Ren; Q Meng; C Chen; M Chen; Y Feng; D Huang
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Effect of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Positioning: A Patient-Specific Numerical Model.

Authors:  Matteo Bianchi; Gil Marom; Ram P Ghosh; Harold A Fernandez; James R Taylor; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Feasibility of sheathless transfemoral aortic valve implantation in patients with small access vessel diameters.

Authors:  Nicolas A Geis; Emmanuel Chorianopoulos; Klaus Kallenbach; Florian André; Sven T Pleger; Matthias Karck; Hugo A Katus; Raffi Bekeredjian
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Type of Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Aviv A Shaul; Ran Kornowski; Tamir Bental; Hana Vaknin-Assa; Abid Assali; Gregory Golovchiner; Ehud Kadmon; Pablo Codner; Katia Orvin; Boris Strasberg; Alon Barsheshet
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  Impact of renal dysfunction on mid-term outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chi Chen; Zhen-Gang Zhao; Yan-Biao Liao; Yong Peng; Qing-Tao Meng; Hua Chai; Qiao Li; Xiao-Lin Luo; Wei Liu; Chen Zhang; Mao Chen; De-Jia Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transfemoral versus transapical approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: hospital outcome and risk factor analysis.

Authors:  Enrico Ferrari; Eric Eeckhout; Sanjiv Keller; Olivier Muller; Piergiorgio Tozzi; Denis Berdajs; Ludwig Karl von Segesser
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 8.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Artery Revascularization Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Chun Shing Kwok; Sudhakar George; Davide Capodanno; Peter F Ludman; Jonathan N Townend; Sagar N Doshi; Saib S Khogali; Philippe Généreux; Howard C Herrmann; Mamas A Mamas; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in very elderly patients: immediate results and medium term follow-up.

Authors:  Isaac Pascual; Antonio J Muñoz-García; Diego López-Otero; Pablo Avanzas; Manuel F Jimenez-Navarro; Belén Cid-Alvarez; Raquel Del Valle; Juan H Alonso-Briales; Raimundo Ocaranza-Sanchez; José M Hernández; Ramiro Trillo-Nouche; César Morís
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.327

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.