Literature DB >> 23414935

Are implant designer series believable? Comparison of survivorship between designer series and national registries.

Hany Bedair1, Bryan Lawless, Henrik Malchau.   

Abstract

Performance of hip and knee implants reported by the designing surgeon(s) is often felt to be more optimistic than those observed in non-designer series. The purpose of this study is to compare the survivorship of hip and knee prostheses in series reported by designers with those in national joint registries. Fifteen different hip and knee implant results published by designers were identified and compared to four national registries. Thirty-two percent of comparisons performed demonstrated greater survivorship in the designer series compared to the registry, while 0% reported lower, and 68% demonstrated no difference. Two implants accounted for the majority (12/16) of the discordances. There was a lower (62%) concordance rate between the registries than between the designer series and registries (68%).
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414935     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  What have we learned from 100% success of press fit condylar rotating platform posterior stabilized knees?: A 5-10 years followup by a nondesigner.

Authors:  Shrinand V Vaidya; Siddharth Virani; Rajendra Phunde; Abhishek Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 2.  What is the "safe zone" for transition of coronal alignment from systematic to a more personalised one in total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin L Schelker; Andrej M Nowakowski; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.114

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.