Literature DB >> 23414904

Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation.

Sheng Jie Luo1, Yu Jie Zhou, Dong Mei Shi, Hai Long Ge, Jian Long Wang, Rui Fang Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial necrosis occurs frequently in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). This study assessed the protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing successful drug-eluting stent implantation with normal baseline troponin values.
METHODS: We analyzed 205 participants with normal baseline troponin values undergoing successful coronary stent implantation. Subjects were randomized to 2 groups: The RIPC group (n = 101), whose members received RIPC (created by three 5-minute inflations of a pneumatic medical tourniquet cuff to 200 mm Hg around the upper arm, interspersed with 5-minute intervals of reperfusion) < 2 hours before the PCI procedure, and the control group (n = 104).
RESULTS: The primary outcomes were high sensitive cardiac troponin I (hscTnI) levels and incidence of myocardial infarction (MI 4a, defined as hscTnI > 0.20 ng/mL) at 16 hours after the PCI procedure. The median hscTnI at 16 hours after PCI was lower in the RIPC group compared with the unpreconditioned, control group (0.11 vs 0.21 ng/mL; P < 0.01). The incidence of MI 4a was lower in the RIPC group compared with the control group (39% vs 54%, P < 0.05). Index of renal function showed no difference between the 2 groups at 16 hours after PCI (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: RIPC reduced post-PCI TnI release and incidence of MI 4a in patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation.
Copyright © 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414904     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  25 in total

1.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning has a Cardioprotective Effect in Children in the Early Postoperative Phase: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Wen Tan; Chaoji Zhang; Jianzhou Liu; Xiaofeng Li; Yuzhi Chen; Qi Miao
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning: Mechanisms and clinical evidences.

Authors:  Alberto Aimo; Chiara Borrelli; Alberto Giannoni; Luigi Emilio Pastormerlo; Andrea Barison; Gianluca Mirizzi; Michele Emdin; Claudio Passino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

3.  Remote ischemic preconditioning for elective endovascular intracranial aneurysm repair: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Seyedsaadat; Leonardo Rangel Castilla; Giuseppe Lanzino; Harry J Cloft; Daniel J Blezek; Amy Theiler; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Waleed Brinjikji; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 4.  Remote ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cardiac phosphoproteomics during remote ischemic preconditioning: a role for the sarcomeric Z-disk proteins.

Authors:  Safa Abdul-Ghani; Kate J Heesom; Gianni D Angelini; M-Saadeh Suleiman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces perioperative cardiac and renal events in patients undergoing elective coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials.

Authors:  Hanjun Pei; Yongjian Wu; Yingjie Wei; Yuejin Yang; Siyong Teng; Haitao Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Remote ischaemic conditioning: cardiac protection from afar.

Authors:  V Sivaraman; J M J Pickard; D J Hausenloy
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 8.  Ischaemic conditioning and reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Prognostically relevant periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction associated with percutaneous coronary interventions: a Consensus Document of the ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

Authors:  Heerajnarain Bulluck; Valeria Paradies; Emanuele Barbato; Andreas Baumbach; Hans Erik Bøtker; Davide Capodanno; Raffaele De Caterina; Claudio Cavallini; Sean M Davidson; Dmitriy N Feldman; Péter Ferdinandy; Sebastiano Gili; Mariann Gyöngyösi; Vijay Kunadian; Sze-Yuan Ooi; Rosalinda Madonna; Michael Marber; Roxana Mehran; Gjin Ndrepepa; Cinzia Perrino; Stefanie Schüpke; Johanne Silvain; Joost P G Sluijter; Giuseppe Tarantini; Gabor G Toth; Linda W Van Laake; Clemens von Birgelen; Michel Zeitouni; Allan S Jaffe; Kristian Thygesen; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Remote ischaemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Xiaowei Niu; Jingjing Zhang; De Chen; Guozhen Wan; Yiming Zhang; Yali Yao
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.