PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and pathologic factors significant in predicting local response and time to further treatment after low-dose involved-field radiation therapy (LD-IFRT) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of NHL patients treated at a single institution between April 2004 and September 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Low-dose involved-field radiation therapy was given as 4 Gy in 2 fractions over 2 consecutive days. Treatment response and disease control were determined by radiographic studies and/or physical examination. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effect of tumor and patient characteristics on disease response. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess time to further treatment. RESULTS: We treated a total of 187 sites in 127 patients with LD-IFRT. Histologies included 66% follicular, 9% chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma, 10% marginal zone, 6% mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 8% other. Median follow-up time was 23.4 months (range, 0.03-92.2 months). The complete response, partial response, and overall response rates were 57%, 25%, and 82%, respectively. A CLL histology was associated with a lower response rate (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.5, P=.02). Tumor size, site, age at diagnosis, and prior systemic therapy were not associated with response. The median time to first recurrence was 13.6 months. Those with CLL and age ≤ 50 years at diagnosis had a shorter time to further treatment for local failures (hazard ratio [HR] 3.63, P=.01 and HR 5.50, P=.02, respectively). Those with CLL and MCL had a shorter time to further treatment for distant failures (HR 11.1 and 16.3, respectively, P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: High local response rates were achieved with LD-IFRT across most histologies. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and MCL histologies and age ≤ 50 years at diagnosis had a shorter time to further treatment after LD-IFRT.
PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and pathologic factors significant in predicting local response and time to further treatment after low-dose involved-field radiation therapy (LD-IFRT) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Records of NHLpatients treated at a single institution between April 2004 and September 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Low-dose involved-field radiation therapy was given as 4 Gy in 2 fractions over 2 consecutive days. Treatment response and disease control were determined by radiographic studies and/or physical examination. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effect of tumor and patient characteristics on disease response. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess time to further treatment. RESULTS: We treated a total of 187 sites in 127 patients with LD-IFRT. Histologies included 66% follicular, 9% chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma, 10% marginal zone, 6% mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 8% other. Median follow-up time was 23.4 months (range, 0.03-92.2 months). The complete response, partial response, and overall response rates were 57%, 25%, and 82%, respectively. A CLL histology was associated with a lower response rate (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.5, P=.02). Tumor size, site, age at diagnosis, and prior systemic therapy were not associated with response. The median time to first recurrence was 13.6 months. Those with CLL and age ≤ 50 years at diagnosis had a shorter time to further treatment for local failures (hazard ratio [HR] 3.63, P=.01 and HR 5.50, P=.02, respectively). Those with CLL and MCL had a shorter time to further treatment for distant failures (HR 11.1 and 16.3, respectively, P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: High local response rates were achieved with LD-IFRT across most histologies. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and MCL histologies and age ≤ 50 years at diagnosis had a shorter time to further treatment after LD-IFRT.
Authors: Matthew S Ning; Chelsea C Pinnix; Bhavana V Chapman; Jillian R Gunther; Sarah A Milgrom; Joseph D Khoury; Preetesh Jain; Wendy Y Chen; Onyeka N Oriabure; Maria R Badillo; L Michael Wang; Bouthaina S Dabaja Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-07-09
Authors: Chelsea C Pinnix; Bouthaina S Dabaja; Sarah A Milgrom; Grace L Smith; Zeinab Abou; Loretta Nastoupil; Jorge Romaguera; Francesco Turturro; Nathan Fowler; Luis Fayad; Jason Westin; Sattva Neelapu; Michelle A Fanale; Maria A Rodriguez; Frederick Hagemeister; Hun Ju Lee; Yasuhiro Oki; Michael Wang; Felipe Samaniego; Linda Chi; Bita Esmaeli Journal: Head Neck Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Mitchell Sabloff; Ronald M Sobecks; Kwang Woo Ahn; Xiaochun Zhu; Marcos de Lima; Jennifer R Brown; Yoshihiro Inamoto; H Kent Holland; Mahmoud D Aljurf; Mary J Laughlin; Rammurti T Kamble; Jack W Hsu; Baldeep M Wirk; Matthew Seftel; Ian D Lewis; Mukta Arora; Edwin P Alyea; Matt E Kalaycio; Jorge Cortes; Richard T Maziarz; Robert Peter Gale; Wael Saber Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Marzia Cerrato; Erika Orlandi; Angelisa Vella; Sara Bartoncini; Giuseppe C Iorio; Diego Bongiovanni; Francesco Capriotti; Carola Boccomini; Francesco Vassallo; Chiara Cavallin; Viola De Luca; Francesca R Giglioli; Umberto Ricardi; Mario Levis Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 3.039