| Literature DB >> 23414740 |
Bulent Gorenek1, Gulmira Kudaiberdieva.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Its management requires high healthcare expenditures; 52%-70% of expenses for AF care are constituted by hospitalization costs. The current management strategies of pharmacological rhythm control and pharmacological or invasive rate control show no difference in impact on major outcomes in patients with AF. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) has been shown to reduce the risk of AF recurrence, improve quality of life and reduce hospitalization rate as compared to pharmacological rhythm control and rate control strategies. This review summarizes current knowledge on cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of RFA for patients with atrial fibrillation.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Cost analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Outcomes; Radiofrequency catheter ablation
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23414740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol ISSN: 0167-5273 Impact factor: 4.164