Literature DB >> 23414716

Dose and image quality of high-pitch dual source computed tomography for the evaluation of cervical lymph node status - comparison to regular 128-slice single source computed tomography.

Boris Bodelle1, Ralf W Bauer, Lara Holthaus, Boris Schulz, Firas Al-Butmeh, Julian L Wichmann, Martin Beeres, Thomas J Vogl, J Matthias Kerl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A high-pitch dual-source CT (DSCT) was compared to a standard single-source CT protocol in terms of dose and image quality for malignant lymphoma staging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 43 patients who underwent DSCT (group 1) of the neck for staging of malignant lymphoma and 40 patients who underwent regular single source CT (group 2) were investigated retrospectively. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), background noise (BN), attenuation values, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), scan time, effective tube current-time product (eff. mAs), subjective diagnostic image quality and artifact burden were compared.
RESULTS: CTDIvol (5.5 ± 0.8 mGy vs. 12.4 ± 1.4 mGy), DLP (172 ± 27 mGycm vs. 344 ± 60 mGycm, p<0.0001), eff. mAs (98 ± 15 mAs vs. 183 ± 20 mAs, p<0.0001) and scan time (0.64 ± 0.05 s vs. 8.21 ± 0.72 s) were lower for group 1. BN was higher (p<0.001) for group 1 with a mean difference of 2.6 HU. SNR for sternocleidomastoid and pectoral muscle was lower (6.6-12.3 vs. 7.8-19.1) for group 1. Subjective image quality (1.55 ± 0.6 vs. 1.42 ± 0.5) and artifact burden (1.62 ± 1.0 vs. 1.57 ± 0.9) were not rated significantly different (p=0.47 and p=0.80) with a good inter-observer agreement (κ=0.59-0.90).
CONCLUSION: High-pitch DSCT allows reduction of patient dose for cervical lymphoma staging while diagnostic image quality is preserved.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414716     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

1.  Low-tube-voltage 80-kVp neck CT: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement.

Authors:  J L Wichmann; J Kraft; E-M Nöske; B Bodelle; I Burck; J-E Scholtz; C Frellesen; J Wagenblast; J M Kerl; R W Bauer; T Lehnert; T J Vogl; B Schulz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Impact of model-based iterative reconstruction on image quality of contrast-enhanced neck CT.

Authors:  S Gaddikeri; J B Andre; J Benjert; D S Hippe; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality in low radiation dose chest CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Ting-Ting Zhang; Zhi-Hai Hu; Juan Li; Hong-Jun Hou; Zu-Shan Xu; Wen He
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.