Literature DB >> 23414675

Comparative evaluation of two rapid methods for differentiating mycobacteria.

Xiaomao Yin1, Lei Zheng, Lijuan Wu, Nannan Cao, Fen Zheng, Yanwei Hu, Min Lin, Peng Zhang, Qian Wang.   

Abstract

The real-time PCR with duplex primer sets and the MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay are newly developed methods for rapid differentiation of mycobacteria. The aim of this study is to evaluate the two methods for differentiation between Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and nontuberculous mycobacteria. A total of 95 clinical mycobacterial isolates belonging to 22 different species and 16 reference strains of 16 different species were differentiated by duplex real-time PCR method and MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay method. The two methods were evaluated by comparison with conventional biochemical technique as the gold standard method. The duplex real-time PCR method correctly differentiated all reference strains as well as the MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay method. For clinical isolates, the accuracy of the duplex real-time PCR method (100%) was slightly higher than the MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay method (97.9%), but there was no statistical significance between the two methods (P > 0.05), and there was an excellent agreement between them (Kappa = 0.957). The duplex real-time PCR method possesses greater potential for differentiation of mycobacteria in the clinical laboratory than the MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay method. However, the MPB64-based immunochromatographic assay method is more convenient than the duplex real-time PCR method when the number of sample is small.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414675     DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)        ISSN: 1472-9792            Impact factor:   3.131


  1 in total

1.  Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria species by multiplex real-time PCR with high-resolution melting.

Authors:  Aline Dos Santos Peixoto; Lílian Maria Lapa Montenegro; Andrea Santos Lima; Fábio Lopes Melo; Walter Lins Barbosa Júnior; Maria Madileuza Carneiro Neves; Jesus Pais Ramos; Haiana Charifker Schindler; Zulma Maria Medeiros
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.581

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.