Literature DB >> 23414636

The Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative: has it made a difference?

Barry D Davis1, H James Norton, David G Jacobs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative (ODBC) was established in 2003 to increase the number of transplantable organs in the United States. However, recent publications have suggested that the ODBC has not impacted donation conversion rates at local organ procurement organizations (OPOs). We sought to determine the impact, if any, of our becoming part of the ODBC on organ donation rates in our OPO or in our institution (Carolinas Medical Center [CMC]), particularly among minority donors.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of data entered concurrently into a patient referral database maintained by our local OPO. Donation approach and consent rates were calculated. They were then analyzed by race and institution, and trends were analyzed over the study period of 2002 to 2010. Statistical differences between the various patient groups were determined by the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test. Statistical differences over time were determined by the Cochran-Armitage trend test.
RESULTS: From 2002 to 2010, 10,855 patients were screened by our OPO for potential organ donation. The overall approach rate was 13.4%, and the consent rate was 57.6%. An increase in approach and consent rates was noted beginning in 2004, but this increase was not sustained. Consent rates in general were higher for white patients than for black and Hispanic patients. Consent rates for CMC did increase significantly (P = .02), but they did not increase for the non-CMC hospitals. When analyzed by race, no significant changes were noted in consent rates over time. When analyzed by race and institution, the only statistically significant increase in consent rates occurred for white patients at CMC.
CONCLUSIONS: Since joining the ODBC, we have noted an increase in consent rates at a single institution (CMC), but no other significant changes. Greater emphasis should be placed on methods to increase and sustain consent rates for all racial groups in general, with a special emphasis on increasing consent rates in minority patients.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414636     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

1.  Procedure Preference and Intention-to-Treat Outcomes after Listing for Lung Transplantation among U.S. Adults. A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michaela R Anderson; Ashley Tabah; Arindam RoyChoudhury; David J Lederer
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-02

2.  Communicating Effectively about Organ Donation: A Randomized Trial of a Behavioral Communication Intervention to Improve Discussions about Donation.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather M Traino; Maureen Wilson Genderson
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2015-03

3.  Assessment of resident and fellow knowledge of the organ donor referral process.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Ralph J Passarella; Megan L Salter; Lauren M Kucirka; Babak J Orandi; Andrew H Law; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Breakdown in the organ donation process and its effect on organ availability.

Authors:  Manik Razdan; Howard B Degenholtz; Jeremy M Kahn; Julia Driessen
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2015-04-09

5.  Defining Quality Criteria for Success in Organ Donation Programs: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Vanessa Silva E Silva; Janine Schirmer; Bartira D'Aguiar Roza; Priscilla Caroliny de Oliveira; Sonny Dhanani; Joan Almost; Markus Schafer; Joan Tranmer
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-02-20

6.  Deceased organ donation for transplantation: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Raffaele Girlanda
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-09-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.