OBJECTIVE: Cystatin C is a novel marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we prospectively investigated whether plasma levels of cystatin C predict new-onset metabolic syndrome (MetS) as well as long-term progression and incidence of the different components of the MetS. METHODS: Cystatin C was measured in 1502 individuals included in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cardiovascular cohort (mean age 56 years, 59% women) who were free from the MetS at baseline and subsequently underwent a follow-up examination after a median of 16 years. MetS was defined according to the NCEP-ATP-III guidelines. Logistic regression was used to adjust for covariates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Metabolic syndrome and long-term progression as well as incidence of the different components of the MetS. RESULTS: During follow-up, 428 subjects developed new-onset MetS. In age- and sex-adjusted analysis, compared with the lowest quartile of cystatin C, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for incident MetS in subjects with cystatin C levels in quartiles 2, 3 and 4 were 1.00 (0.71-1.40), 1.48 (1.06-2.07) and 1.91 (1.37-2.68), respectively (Ptrend < 0.001); this linear association remained significant even after full multivariate adjustment (Ptrend = 0.041). Interestingly, in this fully adjusted model, long-term progression of abdominal obesity was the only component of the MetS significantly associated with increasing quartiles of baseline cystatin C levels (Ptrend = 0.008). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that cystatin C may adversely affect metabolic factors, particularly abdominal obesity, thus contributing to development of the MetS. Our results may help to explain the link between cystatin C and development of CVD.
OBJECTIVE:Cystatin C is a novel marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we prospectively investigated whether plasma levels of cystatin C predict new-onset metabolic syndrome (MetS) as well as long-term progression and incidence of the different components of the MetS. METHODS:Cystatin C was measured in 1502 individuals included in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cardiovascular cohort (mean age 56 years, 59% women) who were free from the MetS at baseline and subsequently underwent a follow-up examination after a median of 16 years. MetS was defined according to the NCEP-ATP-III guidelines. Logistic regression was used to adjust for covariates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Metabolic syndrome and long-term progression as well as incidence of the different components of the MetS. RESULTS: During follow-up, 428 subjects developed new-onset MetS. In age- and sex-adjusted analysis, compared with the lowest quartile of cystatin C, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for incident MetS in subjects with cystatin C levels in quartiles 2, 3 and 4 were 1.00 (0.71-1.40), 1.48 (1.06-2.07) and 1.91 (1.37-2.68), respectively (Ptrend < 0.001); this linear association remained significant even after full multivariate adjustment (Ptrend = 0.041). Interestingly, in this fully adjusted model, long-term progression of abdominal obesity was the only component of the MetS significantly associated with increasing quartiles of baseline cystatin C levels (Ptrend = 0.008). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that cystatin C may adversely affect metabolic factors, particularly abdominal obesity, thus contributing to development of the MetS. Our results may help to explain the link between cystatin C and development of CVD.
Authors: Patrik Svensson-Färbom; Peter Almgren; Bo Hedblad; Gunnar Engström; Margaretha Persson; Anders Christensson; Olle Melander Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mariëtte E G Kranendonk; Dominique P V de Kleijn; Eric Kalkhoven; Danny A Kanhai; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal; Yolanda van der Graaf; Gerard Pasterkamp; Frank L J Visseren Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Martin Magnusson; John Molvin; Gunnar Engström; Patrik Svensson-Färbom; Margaretha Persson; Anders Christensson; Peter Nilsson; Olle Melander Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Isabel Gonçalves; Karin Hultman; Pontus Dunér; Andreas Edsfeldt; Bo Hedblad; Gunilla Nordin Fredrikson; Harry Björkbacka; Jan Nilsson; Eva Bengtsson Journal: Open Heart Date: 2016-01-27