| Literature DB >> 23414441 |
Phuong Van Ngoc Nguyen1, Tang Kim Hong, Truong Hoang, Dung The Nguyen, Annie R Robert.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two previous surveys conducted in Ho Chi Minh City revealed an increasing prevalence of overweight and obese adolescents, from 5.9% in 2002 to 11.7% in 2004. From 2004 to 2010, the government set up and implemented health promotion programs to promote physical activity and good nutritional habits in order to prevent overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents in urban areas of Ho Chi Minh City in 2010.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23414441 PMCID: PMC3598401 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Anthropometric measurements by age and gender of 1989 pupils from Ho Chi Minh City
| Boys | 193 | 227 | 326 | 201 | 947 | |
| Girls | 190 | 301 | 332 | 219 | 1042 | |
| Boys | 42 ± 12 | 46 ± 11 | 51 ± 12 | 53 ± 12 | 48 ± 12 | |
| Girls | 40 ± 9 | 44 ± 8 | 47 ± 8 | 46 ± 8 | 45 ± 8 | |
| Boys | 145 ± 8 | 152 ± 8 | 158 ± 8 | 163 ± 8 | 155 ± 10 | |
| Girls | 146 ± 7 | 152 ± 6 | 153 ± 6 | 154 ± 6 | 152 ± 7 | |
| Boys | 19.8 ± 3.8 | 19.9 ± 3.7 | 20.0 ± 4.0 | 19.7 ± 3.6 | 19.9 ± 3.8 | |
| Girls | 18.5 ± 3.1 | 19.1 ± 2.7 | 19.9 ± 3.0 | 19.5 ± 2.9 | 19.3 ± 3.0 | |
| Boys | 0.74 ± 1.42 | 0.50 ± 1.35 | 0.22 ± 1.42 | −0.17 ± 1.31 | 0.31 ± 1.42 | |
| Girls | 0.13 ± 1.20 | 0.11 ± 1.03 | 0.09 ± 1.07 | −0.31 ± 1.05 | 0.02 ± 1.09 | |
BMI z-score: z-score based on WHO 2007 reference values[17].
Anthropometric measurements by age and school location of 1989 pupils from Ho Chi Minh City
| Wealthy districts (n*) | 261 (7) | 328 (5) | 454 (12) | 236 (6) | 1279 (30) | |
| Less wealthy districts (n*) | 122 (5) | 200 (12) | 204 (8) | 184 (6) | 710 (31) | |
| Wealthy districts | 50.2 | 40.2 | 47.6 | 48.3 | 45.8 | |
| Less wealthy districts | 50.8 | 47.5 | 53.9 | 51.1 | 50.8 | |
| Wealthy districts | 42 ± 10 | 46 ± 10 | 50 ± 10 | 51 ± 12 | 47 ± 11 | |
| Less wealthy districts | 39 ± 9 | 43 ± 9 | 46 ± 10 | 48 ± 9 | 45 ± 10 | |
| Wealthy districts | 146 ± 7 | 152 ± 7 | 156 ± 7 | 158 ± 8 | 153 ± 8 | |
| Less wealthy districts | 144 ± 7 | 151 ± 7 | 155 ± 7 | 158 ± 8 | 153 ± 9 | |
| Wealthy districts | 19.5 ± 3.6 | 19.7 ± 3.2 | 20.3 ± 3.6 | 20.0 ± 3.5 | 19.9 ± 3.5 | |
| Less wealthy districts | 18.5 ± 3.4 | 18.9 ± 3.1 | 19.2 ± 3.2 | 19.2 ± 3.0 | 19.0 ± 3.1 | |
| Wealthy districts | 0.56 ± 1.32 | 0.39 ± 1.16 | 0.28 ± 1.25 | −0.11 ± 1.20 | 0.30 ± 1.25 | |
| Less wealthy districts | 0.15 ± 1.38 | 0.09 ± 1.23 | 0.12 ± 1.23 | −0.41 ± 1.14 | −0.09 ± 1.25 | |
BMI z-score: z-score based on WHO 2007 reference values[17]. n*: number of missing data.
Prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents by age, gender, and puberty stage
| | | | | |
| Boys | 22.0 | 5.4 | ||
| Girls | 13.3 | 1.3 | ||
| | | | | |
| 11 years | 23.6 | 4.8 | 2.18 (1.00, 4.82) | |
| 12 years | 18.4 | 2.8 | 1.27 (0.59, 3.00) | |
| 13 years | 18.5 | 3.3 | 1.50 (0.69, 3.22) | |
| ≥ 14 years | 10.6 | 2.2 | ||
| | | | | |
| Pre-pubertal | 21.0 | 1.21 ( 0.94, 1.55) | 5.5 | |
| Pubertal | 17.3 | 2.9 | ||
| 17.8 | 3.2 | |||
IOTF’s definition for overweight and obesity in adolescents[15]. PR: Prevalence ratio.
Figure 1Prevalence of overweight and obesity by age and sex of teenagers from HCMC.
Prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents by gender, school location, and economic status of family
| | | | | |
| Wealthy districts | 20.6 | 3.8 | 1.81 (1.0, 3.15) | |
| Less wealthy districts | 12.1 | 2.1 | ||
| | | | | |
| Poorest (1st quintile) | 12.3 | 3.6 | ||
| 2nd quintile | 11.7 | 0.95 (0.65, 1.39) | 1.3 | 0.36 (0.13, 0.99) |
| 3rd quintile | 19.9 | 1.9 | 0.53 (0.22, 1.22) | |
| 4th quintile | 20.8 | 5.3 | 1.47 (0.77, 3.00) | |
| Richest (5th quintile) | 24.4 | 4.3 | 1.19 (0.62, 2.47) | |
PR: Prevalence ratio.IOTF definition for overweight and obesity in adolescents[15].
Figure 2Prevalence of overweight and obesity by economic level and sex of teenagers from HCMC.
Prevalence (%) of overweight and obesity in boys and girls of HCMC in 2010, using different definitions
| | | | | | | | | | |
| IOTF | 30.5 | 24.0 | 22.8 | 14.5 | 16.6 | 14.3 | 14.4 | 7.1 | 17.8 |
| CDC | 21.5 | 17.5 | 15.7 | 9.8 | 15.0 | 13.3 | 14.0 | 5.8 | 14.1 |
| WHO | 28.2 | 24.8 | 20.0 | 14.1 | 22.4 | 19.0 | 19.0 | 10.0 | 19.6 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| IOTF | 7.0 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 3.2 |
| CDC | 18.1 | 13.0 | 12.1 | 7.8 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 7.2 |
| WHO | 21.6 | 14.3 | 12.8 | 7.2 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 7.9 |
IOTF: International Obesity Taskforce[15]. CDC: The Centers for Disease Control[20]. WHO: World Health Organization[17].