D L Hertz1, S Roy, A A Motsinger-Reif, A Drobish, L S Clark, H L McLeod, L A Carey, E C Dees. 1. Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. danhertz@email.unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel-induced neuropathy is an adverse event that often leads to therapeutic disruption and patient discomfort. We attempted to replicate a previously reported association between increased neuropathy risk and CYP2C8*3 genotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were collected for paclitaxel-treated breast cancer patients who were genotyped for the CYP2C8*3 K399R (rs10509681) variant. A log-rank test was used in the primary analysis of European-American patients. An additional independent replication was then attempted in a cohort of African-American patients, followed by modeling of the entire patient cohort with relevant covariates. RESULTS: In the primary analysis of 209 European patients, there was an increased risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy related to CYP2C8*3 status [HR (per allele) = 1.93 (95% CI: 1.05-3.55), overall log-rank P = 0.006]. The association was replicated in direction and magnitude of effect in 107 African-American patients (P = 0.043). In the Cox model using the entire mixed-race cohort (n = 411), each CYP2C8*3 allele approximately doubled the patient's risk of grade 2+ neuropathy (P = 0.004), and non-Europeans were at higher neuropathy risk than Europeans of similar genotype (P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in patients who carry the CYP2C8*3 variant was replicated in two racially distinct patient cohorts.
BACKGROUND:Paclitaxel-induced neuropathy is an adverse event that often leads to therapeutic disruption and patient discomfort. We attempted to replicate a previously reported association between increased neuropathy risk and CYP2C8*3 genotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were collected for paclitaxel-treated breast cancerpatients who were genotyped for the CYP2C8*3 K399R (rs10509681) variant. A log-rank test was used in the primary analysis of European-American patients. An additional independent replication was then attempted in a cohort of African-American patients, followed by modeling of the entire patient cohort with relevant covariates. RESULTS: In the primary analysis of 209 European patients, there was an increased risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy related to CYP2C8*3 status [HR (per allele) = 1.93 (95% CI: 1.05-3.55), overall log-rank P = 0.006]. The association was replicated in direction and magnitude of effect in 107 African-American patients (P = 0.043). In the Cox model using the entire mixed-race cohort (n = 411), each CYP2C8*3 allele approximately doubled the patient's risk of grade 2+ neuropathy (P = 0.004), and non-Europeans were at higher neuropathy risk than Europeans of similar genotype (P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in patients who carry the CYP2C8*3 variant was replicated in two racially distinct patient cohorts.
Authors: T K Bergmann; C Brasch-Andersen; H Gréen; M Mirza; R S Pedersen; F Nielsen; K Skougaard; J Wihl; N Keldsen; P Damkier; L E Friberg; C Peterson; W Vach; M O Karlsson; K Brosen Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Sophie E Rowbotham; Alan V Boddy; Chris P F Redfern; Gareth J Veal; Ann K Daly Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Christine M Walko; Arlene S Bridges; J Heyward Hull; Jill Herendeen; Kristan Rollins; Paul B Watkins; E Claire Dees Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Stephan Mielke; Klaus Mross; Thomas A Gerds; Anja Schmidt; Ralph Wäsch; Dietmar P Berger; Winand Lange; Dirk Behringer Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Wallace Akerley; James E Herndon; Merrill J Egorin; Alan P Lyss; Hedy L Kindler; Dianne M Savarese; Carol A Sherman; D Marc Rosen; Donna Hollis; Mark J Ratain; Mark R Green Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mike Mattie; Ashley Christensen; Mi Sook Chang; William Yeh; Suzanne Said; Yuriy Shostak; Linnette Capo; Alla Verlinsky; Zili An; Ingrid Joseph; Yi Zhang; Sathish Kumar-Ganesan; Karen Morrison; David Stover; Pia Challita-Eid Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Marium Husain; Timiya S Nolan; Kevin Foy; Raquel Reinbolt; Cassandra Grenade; Maryam Lustberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: David Church; Rachel Kerr; Enric Domingo; Dan Rosmarin; Claire Palles; Kevin Maskell; Ian Tomlinson; David Kerr Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Shuiying Hu; Kevin M Huang; Elizabeth J Adams; Charles L Loprinzi; Maryam B Lustberg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amy L Pasternak; Kristen M Ward; Jasmine A Luzum; Vicki L Ellingrod; Daniel L Hertz Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Marco Sisignano; Carlo Angioni; Chul-Kyu Park; Sascha Meyer Dos Santos; Holger Jordan; Maria Kuzikov; Di Liu; Sebastian Zinn; Stephan W Hohman; Yannick Schreiber; Béla Zimmer; Mike Schmidt; Ruirui Lu; Jing Suo; Dong-Dong Zhang; Stephan M G Schäfer; Martine Hofmann; Ajay S Yekkirala; Natasja de Bruin; Michael J Parnham; Clifford J Woolf; Ru-Rong Ji; Klaus Scholich; Gerd Geisslinger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gary R Zirpoli; Susan E McCann; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell; Dawn L Hershman; Gregory Ciupak; Warren Davis; Joseph M Unger; Halle C F Moore; James A Stewart; Claudine Isaacs; Timothy J Hobday; Muhammad Salim; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Julie R Gralow; G Thomas Budd; Kathy S Albain; Christine B Ambrosone Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 13.506