AIMS: Ambulance services in England receive around 8 million calls a year, and no known studies have explored characteristics of frequent callers. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of the most frequent callers to Yorkshire Ambulance Service (YAS) between April 2010 and March 2011. METHODS: Top 100 frequent callers to YAS were analysed using population comparison, case control and multiple regression methods. 7808 calls were made by the frequent callers, and data were analysed to predict total number of calls made, and explore characteristics of frequent callers. RESULTS: Six call codes were associated with a higher number of calls. Frequent callers were assigned slower response levels, or often no call code. Calls increased during the times of 4:00-9:00, 16:00-20:00 and 22:00-2:00, and in the months of December, January and February. Men and patients with all but the very highest conveyance rates had a higher number of different reasons for calling. Patients with a medical diagnosis were more likely to be conveyed, while patients with a psychiatric classification had a higher number of different reasons for calling, were older and were more likely to call for 'assault/sexual assault' or 'haemorrhage/laceration'. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent callers to YAS were a heterogeneous group that differed from the overall population served, resulting in numerous implications for the delivery of services for this group of patients. Further research is required to determine if and how frequent callers differ from frequent attenders at emergency departments. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
AIMS: Ambulance services in England receive around 8 million calls a year, and no known studies have explored characteristics of frequent callers. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of the most frequent callers to Yorkshire Ambulance Service (YAS) between April 2010 and March 2011. METHODS: Top 100 frequent callers to YAS were analysed using population comparison, case control and multiple regression methods. 7808 calls were made by the frequent callers, and data were analysed to predict total number of calls made, and explore characteristics of frequent callers. RESULTS: Six call codes were associated with a higher number of calls. Frequent callers were assigned slower response levels, or often no call code. Calls increased during the times of 4:00-9:00, 16:00-20:00 and 22:00-2:00, and in the months of December, January and February. Men and patients with all but the very highest conveyance rates had a higher number of different reasons for calling. Patients with a medical diagnosis were more likely to be conveyed, while patients with a psychiatric classification had a higher number of different reasons for calling, were older and were more likely to call for 'assault/sexual assault' or 'haemorrhage/laceration'. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent callers to YAS were a heterogeneous group that differed from the overall population served, resulting in numerous implications for the delivery of services for this group of patients. Further research is required to determine if and how frequent callers differ from frequent attenders at emergency departments. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Matthew S Leyenaar; Brent McLeod; Aaron Jones; Audrey-Anne Brousseau; Eric Mercier; Ryan P Strum; Michael Nolan; Samir K Sinha; Gina Agarwal; Walter Tavares; Andrew P Costa Journal: CJEM Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 2.410
Authors: Rabeea'h W Aslam; Helen Snooks; Alison Porter; Ashrafunnesa Khanom; Robert Cole; Adrian Edwards; Bethan Edwards; Bridie Angela Evans; Theresa Foster; Rachael Fothergill; Penny Gripper; Ann John; Robin Petterson; Andy Rosser; Anna Tee; Bernadette Sewell; Heather Hughes; Ceri Phillips; Nigel Rees; Jason Scott; Alan Watkins Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Helen A Snooks; Ashrafunnesa Khanom; Robert Cole; Adrian Edwards; Bethan Mair Edwards; Bridie A Evans; Theresa Foster; Rachael T Fothergill; Carol P Gripper; Chelsey Hampton; Ann John; Robin Petterson; Alison Porter; Andy Rosser; Jason Scott Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2019-12-28