A Müller 1 , D Smits , L Claes , M de Zwaan . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Activation System Scale (BIS/BAS-Scales) developed by Carver and White 1 is a self-rating instrument to assess the dispositional sensitivity to punishment and reward. The present work aims to examine the factor structure of the German version of the BIS/BAS-Scales. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a large German population-based sample (n = 1881) the model fit of several factor models was tested by using confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The best model fit was found for the 5-factor model with two BIS (anxiety, fear) and three BAS (drive, reward responsiveness, fun seeking) scales, whereas the BIS-fear, the BAS-reward responsiveness, and the BAS-fun seeking subscales showed low internal consistency. The BIS/BAS scales were negatively correlated with age, and women reported higher BIS subscale scores than men. CONCLUSION: Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a 5-factor model. However, due to the low internal reliability of some of the subscales the use of this model is questionable. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: The Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Activation System Scale (BIS/BAS-Scales) developed by Carver and White 1 is a self-rating instrument to assess the dispositional sensitivity to punishment and reward. The present work aims to examine the factor structure of the German version of the BIS/BAS-Scales. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a large German population-based sample (n = 1881) the model fit of several factor models was tested by using confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The best model fit was found for the 5-factor model with two BIS (anxiety , fear) and three BAS (drive, reward responsiveness, fun seeking) scales, whereas the BIS-fear, the BAS-reward responsiveness, and the BAS-fun seeking subscales showed low internal consistency. The BIS/BAS scales were negatively correlated with age, and women reported higher BIS subscale scores than men . CONCLUSION: Confirmatory factor analyses suggest a 5-factor model. However, due to the low internal reliability of some of the subscales the use of this model is questionable. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Disease
Gene
Species
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2013
PMID: 23412958 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1330482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr ISSN: 0720-4299 Impact factor: 0.752