Literature DB >> 23412447

Infection rates following hip and knee joint arthroplasty: large referral centre versus a small elective-only hospital.

R Asaid1, I Williams, D Hyde, T Tiang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate deep infection rates following hip and knee arthroplasty at a large referral hospital and to compare these rates with a smaller hospital where only elective surgery was performed. Both hospitals were administered by the same public institution.
METHODS: A search of the medical records was performed for all deep infections following elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty; revision procedures were excluded as were total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty following trauma. To be considered, a deep infection cases must have had bacterial growth confirmed on deep tissue surgical specimens or on aspiration of the joint within 1 year of the index procedure.
RESULTS: There were 14 infections confirmed following 1,160 arthroplasties at the larger hospital and 1 infection for the elective-only hospital following 466 arthroplasties. Statistical analysis showed there was a 7.06 greater chance of having an infection at the larger campus compared with the smaller campus CI (1.3, 130.7). Although there was a trend towards a greater number of infections at the larger hospital, the result was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). We acknowledge there were some differences between the two study populations.
CONCLUSION: We found a trend towards, but not a statistically significant difference, between infection rates at the elective-only hospital compared to the larger institution. Given the low overall rate of infection, studies with improved statistical power are needed to determine whether there is a difference in infection rates at smaller elective-only hospitals versus larger hospitals providing elective and non-elective services. The reasons for the difference are likely to be multifactorial. We hypothesise that infection rates are increased in the larger hospital where there is more procedures, both clean and contaminated being performed in the operating theatres, as well as a greater number of inpatient beds and where the hospital admits non-elective cases via its emergency department. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-two cohort study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23412447     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-0937-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  4 in total

1.  The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Michael D Ries
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Jordana Schmier; Kevin L Ong; Ke Zhao; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Primary total knee arthroplasty in California 1991 to 2001: does hospital volume affect outcomes?

Authors:  Nelson F Soohoo; David S Zingmond; Jay R Lieberman; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Prophylactic antibiotics in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John Meehan; Amir A Jamali; Hien Nguyen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.284

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Plastic surgeons' self-reported operative infection rates at a Canadian academic hospital.

Authors:  Wendy Ky Ng; Manraj Nirmal Kaur; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Retained versus resected posterior cruciate ligament in mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a retrospective, clinical and functional assessment.

Authors:  D Enea; V Cigna; C Sgolacchia; L Tozzi; A Verdenelli; A Gigante
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-01-09

3.  Dose intraarticular steroid injection increase the rate of infection in subsequent arthroplasty: grading the evidence through a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Xing; Yang Yang; Xinlong Ma; Jianxiong Ma; Baoyi Ma; Yang Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 4.  International comparison of variation in performance between hospitals for THA and TKA: Is it even possible? A systematic review including 33 studies and 8 arthroplasty register reports.

Authors:  Peter van Schie; Shaho Hasan; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Jan W Schoones; Rob G H H Nelissen; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  A Trend for Increased Risk of Revision Surgery due to Deep Infection following Fast-Track Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Einar Amlie; Anners Lerdal; Caryl L Gay; Øystein Høvik; Lars Nordsletten; Sigbjørn Dimmen
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2016-02-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.