OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is characterized by increased vascular resistance and arterial stiffness, but information about upright hemodynamics is scarce. We compared hemodynamics in hypertensive versus normotensive patients at rest and during passive head-up tilt. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 387, 19-72 years) without antihypertensive medication were recorded using continuous tonometric pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography. Seated office blood pressure was 4/10 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) higher than average supine values during hemodynamic measurements. As there is no accepted cut-off for hypertension during tilt-table tests, supine level at least 135/85 mmHg defined hypertension (n = 155) versus normotension (n = 232). Age, BMI, and proportion of men were higher among hypertensives (49 vs. 42 years, 28 vs. 25, 55 vs. 38%, respectively), and analyses were adjusted for these differences. RESULTS: Both at rest and during head-up tilt radial and aortic blood pressure and pulse pressure, cardiac index (CI) and work, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and augmentation pressure were higher in hypertensive patients (P < 0.05 for all). Adjusted linear regression analyses showed that during passive head-up tilt aortic SBP and pulse pressure, stroke index, and left cardiac work index decreased less; heart rate increased less; and aortic DBP and SVR increased more in hypertensive patients (P < 0.05 for all); whereas reduction in CI and augmentation index did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Not only supine hemodynamics, but also responses to head-up tilt differed between normotensive and hypertensive patients, indicating functional alterations beyond increased vascular resistance and higher arterial stiffness in hypertension.
OBJECTIVE:Hypertension is characterized by increased vascular resistance and arterial stiffness, but information about upright hemodynamics is scarce. We compared hemodynamics in hypertensive versus normotensivepatients at rest and during passive head-up tilt. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 387, 19-72 years) without antihypertensive medication were recorded using continuous tonometric pulse wave analysis and whole-body impedance cardiography. Seated office blood pressure was 4/10 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) higher than average supine values during hemodynamic measurements. As there is no accepted cut-off for hypertension during tilt-table tests, supine level at least 135/85 mmHg defined hypertension (n = 155) versus normotension (n = 232). Age, BMI, and proportion of men were higher among hypertensives (49 vs. 42 years, 28 vs. 25, 55 vs. 38%, respectively), and analyses were adjusted for these differences. RESULTS: Both at rest and during head-up tilt radial and aortic blood pressure and pulse pressure, cardiac index (CI) and work, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and augmentation pressure were higher in hypertensivepatients (P < 0.05 for all). Adjusted linear regression analyses showed that during passive head-up tilt aortic SBP and pulse pressure, stroke index, and left cardiac work index decreased less; heart rate increased less; and aortic DBP and SVR increased more in hypertensivepatients (P < 0.05 for all); whereas reduction in CI and augmentation index did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Not only supine hemodynamics, but also responses to head-up tilt differed between normotensive and hypertensivepatients, indicating functional alterations beyond increased vascular resistance and higher arterial stiffness in hypertension.
Authors: Kati Vääräniemi; Jenni Koskela; Anna Tahvanainen; Antti Tikkakoski; Matias Wilenius; Mika Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Onni Niemelä; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka Pörsti Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Humam Hamid; Venla Kurra; Manoj Kumar Choudhary; Heidi Bouquin; Onni Niemelä; Mika A P Kähönen; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti; Jenni K Koskela Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Pauliina Kangas; Anna Tahvanainen; Antti Tikkakoski; Jenni Koskela; Marko Uitto; Jari Viik; Mika Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka Pörsti Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jenni M Rimpelä; Ilkka H Pörsti; Antti Jula; Terho Lehtimäki; Teemu J Niiranen; Lasse Oikarinen; Kimmo Porthan; Antti Tikkakoski; Juha Virolainen; Kimmo K Kontula; Timo P Hiltunen Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Lauri Suojanen; Antti Haring; Antti Tikkakoski; Heini Huhtala; Mika Kähönen; Arttu Eräranta; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Jenni K Koskela; Anna Tahvanainen; Antti Haring; Antti J Tikkakoski; Erkki Ilveskoski; Jani Viitala; Miia H Leskinen; Terho Lehtimäki; Mika Ap Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Onni Niemelä; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Anna M Tahvanainen; Antti J Tikkakoski; Jenni K Koskela; Klaus Nordhausen; Jani M Viitala; Miia H Leskinen; Mika A P Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Marko T Uitto; Jari Viik; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Manoj Kumar Choudhary; Arttu Eräranta; Antti J Tikkakoski; Heidi Bouquin; Elina J Hautaniemi; Mika Kähönen; Kalle Sipilä; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka Pörsti Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 4.379