Literature DB >> 23412336

Opening up three quantum boxes causes classically undetectable wavefunction collapse.

Richard E George1, Lucio M Robledo, Owen J E Maroney, Machiel S Blok, Hannes Bernien, Matthew L Markham, Daniel J Twitchen, John J L Morton, G Andrew D Briggs, Ronald Hanson.   

Abstract

One of the most striking features of quantum mechanics is the profound effect exerted by measurements alone. Sophisticated quantum control is now available in several experimental systems, exposing discrepancies between quantum and classical mechanics whenever measurement induces disturbance of the interrogated system. In practice, such discrepancies may frequently be explained as the back-action required by quantum mechanics adding quantum noise to a classical signal. Here, we implement the "three-box" quantum game [Aharonov Y, et al. (1991) J Phys A Math Gen 24(10):2315-2328] by using state-of-the-art control and measurement of the nitrogen vacancy center in diamond. In this protocol, the back-action of quantum measurements adds no detectable disturbance to the classical description of the game. Quantum and classical mechanics then make contradictory predictions for the same experimental procedure; however, classical observers are unable to invoke measurement-induced disturbance to explain the discrepancy. We quantify the residual disturbance of our measurements and obtain data that rule out any classical model by ≳7.8 standard deviations, allowing us to exclude the property of macroscopic state definiteness from our system. Our experiment is then equivalent to the test of quantum noncontextuality [Kochen S, Specker E (1967) J Math Mech 17(1):59-87] that successfully addresses the measurement detectability loophole.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23412336      PMCID: PMC3593868          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1208374110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Two-photon quantum interference from separate nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond.

Authors:  Hannes Bernien; Lilian Childress; Lucio Robledo; Matthew Markham; Daniel Twitchen; Ronald Hanson
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1985-03-04       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Testing contextuality on quantum ensembles with one clean qubit.

Authors:  Osama Moussa; Colm A Ryan; David G Cory; Raymond Laflamme
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit.

Authors:  L Dicarlo; M D Reed; L Sun; B R Johnson; J M Chow; J M Gambetta; L Frunzio; S M Girvin; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality with weak measurements of photons.

Authors:  M E Goggin; M P Almeida; M Barbieri; B P Lanyon; J L O'Brien; A G White; G J Pryde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Violation of a temporal bell inequality for single spins in a diamond defect center.

Authors:  G Waldherr; P Neumann; S F Huelga; F Jelezko; J Wrachtrup
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  High-fidelity projective read-out of a solid-state spin quantum register.

Authors:  Lucio Robledo; Lilian Childress; Hannes Bernien; Bas Hensen; Paul F A Alkemade; Ronald Hanson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in high-purity silicon.

Authors:  Alexei M Tyryshkin; Shinichi Tojo; John J L Morton; Helge Riemann; Nikolai V Abrosimov; Peter Becker; Hans-Joachim Pohl; Thomas Schenkel; Michael L W Thewalt; Kohei M Itoh; S A Lyon
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 43.841

9.  Violation of a Leggett-Garg inequality with ideal non-invasive measurements.

Authors:  George C Knee; Stephanie Simmons; Erik M Gauger; John J L Morton; Helge Riemann; Nikolai V Abrosimov; Peter Becker; Hans-Joachim Pohl; Kohei M Itoh; Mike L W Thewalt; G Andrew D Briggs; Simon C Benjamin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  All-optical control of a solid-state spin using coherent dark states.

Authors:  Christopher G Yale; Bob B Buckley; David J Christle; Guido Burkard; F Joseph Heremans; Lee C Bassett; David D Awschalom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Challenging the classical notion of time in cognition: a quantum perspective.

Authors:  James M Yearsley; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A strict experimental test of macroscopic realism in a superconducting flux qubit.

Authors:  George C Knee; Kosuke Kakuyanagi; Mao-Chuang Yeh; Yuichiro Matsuzaki; Hiraku Toida; Hiroshi Yamaguchi; Shiro Saito; Anthony J Leggett; William J Munro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Nonlocal single particle steering generated through single particle entanglement.

Authors:  L M Arévalo Aguilar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  The Oxford Questions on the foundations of quantum physics.

Authors:  G A D Briggs; J N Butterfield; A Zeilinger
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Contextuality without nonlocality in a superconducting quantum system.

Authors:  Markus Jerger; Yarema Reshitnyk; Markus Oppliger; Anton Potočnik; Mintu Mondal; Andreas Wallraff; Kenneth Goodenough; Stephanie Wehner; Kristinn Juliusson; Nathan K Langford; Arkady Fedorov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.