Literature DB >> 23412261

Revision surgery after failed ACL reconstruction with artificial ligaments: clinical, histologic and radiographic evaluation.

Alberto Ventura1, Claudio Legnani, Clara Terzaghi, Enrico Borgo, Walter Albisetti.   

Abstract

Synthetic ligament for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been widely used in the past. Long-term follow-up has demonstrated the unreliability of many of these devices in ACL surgery, and problems may arise for the surgeon approaching a patient with failed artificial ligament reconstruction. The aim of this study is to investigate whether revision surgery may improve clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with failed synthetic ACL reconstruction. Fourteen patients who were treated in the past with ACL reconstruction with synthetic grafts underwent two-stage revision surgery. Follow-up averaged 4.2 years (range 2-6 years). Mean KOOS score was 75.8 (SD 10.2); IKDC score was B in two patients, C in nine and D in three. The improvement compared to preoperative status was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Four patients were positive to Lachman and anterior drawer tests. Mean side-to-side anterior laxity averaged 4.3 mm (SD 1.2). Biopsy specimens documented the presence of foreign body granulomatous reaction, giant foreign body cells and polyethylene wear particles. The level of osteoarthritis worsened at follow-up compared to preoperative status (p < 0.05). ACL revision surgery with autografts in patients who underwent previous failed primary synthetic ligament reconstruction does not improve clinical outcomes and does not influence the natural history of knee osteoarthritis started from artificial ligament debris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23412261     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-1136-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  14 in total

1.  A new generation of artificial ligaments in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Two-year follow-up of a randomised trial.

Authors:  T Nau; P Lavoie; N Duval
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

2.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhong-tang Liu; Xian-long Zhang; Yao Jiang; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

Review 4.  The biochemical and histological effects of artificial ligament wear particles: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  E J Olson; J D Kang; F H Fu; H I Georgescu; G C Mason; C H Evans
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.

Authors:  F Hefti; W Müller; R P Jakob; H U Stäubli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Biological response to ligament wear particles.

Authors:  L E Claes; J Ludwig; K J Margevicius; L Dürselen
Journal:  J Appl Biomater       Date:  1995

7.  The clinical, arthroscopic and histological findings after replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with carbon-fibre.

Authors:  N Rushton; D J Dandy; C P Naylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1983-05

8.  Patient satisfaction needs as related to knee stability and objective findings after ACL reconstruction using the LARS artificial ligament.

Authors: 
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure.

Authors:  E M Roos; H P Roos; L S Lohmander; C Ekdahl; B D Beynnon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  10-16 year results of Leeds-Keio anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Alastair W Murray; M F Macnicol
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A prospective study to assess the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Samer Samir Sayed Mahmoud; Saurabh Odak; Stephen Coogan; Michael J McNicholas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The best cited articles of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST): a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Cyril Mauffrey; Marius M Scarlat; Patrick Simon; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Samo K Fokter; Pierre Kehr
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.