Literature DB >> 23412230

The treatment of femoral neck fractures: results using cephalocervical screws with sliding mechanism.

Daisuke Nishiyama1, Takuji Matsumoto, Hiromi Hamazaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new device for the treatment of femoral neck fractures that uses 2 cephalocervical screws in a sliding mechanism allowing linear intraoperative and postoperative compression has been developed. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the results using this device for the treatment of stable and unstable femoral neck fractures.
METHODS: Between November 2007 and November 2011, 61 consecutive skeletally mature patients with femoral neck fractures were treated with a new cephalocervical screw (Dual SC screw; KISCO DIR Co., Ltd., Kobe). All contactable patients were followed up for a minimum of 16 weeks postoperatively (range 16-123 weeks). Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at the final evaluation. Healing and return to activities of daily living were used to evaluate outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 51 women and 10 men with a mean age of 80.8 years (range, 41-99). The average of surgical time was 33.1 min (21-66 min). One patient died, one was too infirm for follow-up, and eleven could not be located, leaving 48 patients available for final evaluation (78.7%). The overall incidence of nonunion was 10.4%. Fracture nonunion was less common for undisplaced fractures than for displaced fractures (1 of 21 [4.8%] vs. 4 of 27 [14.8%]). The mean amount of collapse of the neck was 5.45 mm (3.92 mm in undisplaced and 6.64 mm in displaced). Radiographic analysis at final evaluation revealed no implant failures. 62.5% of the patients recovered their prefracture status.
CONCLUSION: The Dual SC screw device appears to be a reliable implant for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Its design contributes to overcome the implant failures such as a medial migration, cut-out, or back-out; besides, the union rate of this implant was considered superior to that of existing systems. If the early shortening of the neck occurs after this surgery, the surgeons should be considered to keep them partially weight bearing or choose a replacement procedure for such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23412230     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-1103-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  11 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty: optimal treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  William L Healy; Richard Iorio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Internal fixation implants for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults.

Authors:  M J Parker; G Stockton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

3.  1999 National Hospital Discharge Survey: annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data.

Authors:  J R Popovic
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  2001-09

4.  Trends in the incidence of hip fracture in Japan, 1987-1997: the third nationwide survey.

Authors:  H Orimo; T Hashimoto; K Sakata; N Yoshimura; T Suzuki; T Hosoi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Femoral neck fracture fixation with hook-pins. 2-year results and learning curve in 626 prospective cases.

Authors:  B Strömqvist; L T Nilsson; K G Thorngren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-06

6.  Fixation of fractures of the femoral neck. A prospective, randomised trial of three Ullevaal hip screws versus two Hansson hook-pins.

Authors:  N Lykke; P J Lerud; K Strømsøe; K G Thorngren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-04

7.  Costs of internal fixation and arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized study of 68 patients.

Authors:  Cecilia Rogmark; Ake Carlsson; Olof Johnell; Ingemar Sembo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-06

8.  A randomised study in all cervical hip fractures osteosynthesis with Hansson hook-pins versus AO-screws in 199 consecutive patients followed for two years.

Authors:  Jan Mjørud; Olav Skaro; Jan Helge Solhaug; Karl-Göran Thorngren
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; P J Devereaux; Marc F Swiontkowski; Paul Tornetta; William Obremskey; Kenneth J Koval; Sean Nork; Sheila Sprague; Emil H Schemitsch; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Two methods compared.

Authors:  C Olerud; L Rehnberg; E Hellquist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Prognostic value of the sliding length of cephalocervical screws to predict the risk of non-union after osteosynthesis: a retrospective analysis of 86 patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Yohei Hirakawa; Hidehiro Nakamura; Kazuhito Minamitani; Ryuki Hashida; Masafumi Gotoh; Naoto Shiba
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  The clinical application of a novel method of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures-dynamic locking compression system.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Xiao; Dong-Ping Shu; Ming-Jian Bei; Tao Ji; Wu-Sheng Kan; Shao-Gang Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Influence of the proximal screws of buttress plates on the stability of vertical femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shi Zhan; Dajun Jiang; Jian Xu; Ming Ling; Kai Yang; Yuehua Li; Weitao Jia; Hai Hu; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  TresLock for Unstable Proximal Femoral Fractures: Morphological Compatibility and Clinical Results: A Case Series.

Authors:  Ryo Yoshikawa; Takafumi Hiranaka; Tomoyuki Kamenaga; Takahiro Niikura; Yoshitada Sakai; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2022-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.