Literature DB >> 23412228

Arthroscopy-assisted reduction versus open reduction in the fixation of medial malleolar fractures.

Egemen Turhan1, Mahmut Nedim Doral, Murat Demirel, Ahmet Ozgur Atay, Murat Bozkurt, Onur Bilge, Gazi Huri, Kivanc Atesok, Defne Kaya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Purpose of this case-control study was to evaluate the feasibility and advantages of arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation of isolated medial malleolar fractures and compare the outcomes with conventional open reduction and internal fixation.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients with medial malleolar fractures were grouped into two: arthroscopy-assisted group, and conventional open reduction and internal fixation group. Arthroscopic treatment group consisted of 21 patients. The mean age was 34 years (range: 22-49 years). Conventional open reduction and internal fixation group included 26 patients. The mean age was 42 years (range: 22-58 years). According to Herscovici system, 6 fractures in the arthroscopy group were classified as type-B, 13 fractures as type-C, and 2 fractures were classified as type-D. In both groups, fractures were classified according to Herscovici system. Radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated according to van Dijk classification and Olerud-Molander scoring system, respectively.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 26 months (18-52 months) for arthroscopically assisted group and 38 months (24-58 months) for the conventional group. According to van Dijk classification, there was only one patient with Grade 1 osteoarthritic changes in arthroscopically assisted group compared with the conventional group where two patients had Grade 2 and one patient had Grade 1 osteoarthritic changes. Median Olerud Scores were 92.3 (75-100) and 86.3 (70-100) for the arthroscopically assisted group and for the conventional group, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: With the use of arthroscopically assisted techniques in fixation of isolated medial malleolar fractures, surgeon can evaluate intra-articular surface and reduction that may be of value in the improvement in clinical outcomes over conventional surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23412228     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-1100-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  23 in total

Review 1.  Articular fractures: does an anatomic reduction really change the result?

Authors:  J L Marsh; J Buckwalter; R Gelberman; D Dirschl; S Olson; T Brown; A Llinias
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Conservative treatment of isolated fractures of the medial malleolus.

Authors:  D Herscovici; J M Scaduto; A Infante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-01

3.  The role of ankle arthroscopy on the surgical management of ankle fractures.

Authors:  D B Thordarson; R Bains; L E Shepherd
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  The surgical treatment of malleolar fractures: long-term results.

Authors:  F Specchiulli; R Mangialardi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec

5.  Arthroscopically assisted treatment of ankle fractures: arthroscopic findings and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Atsushi Ono; Shinji Nishikawa; Akihiko Nagao; Tomoyuki Irie; Motoshige Sasaki; Teruo Kouno
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Arthroscopically detected intra-articular lesions associated with acute ankle fractures.

Authors:  Nikoletta Leontaritis; Lauren Hinojosa; Vinod K Panchbhavi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Incidence of chondral lesions of talar dome in ankle fracture types.

Authors:  Seref Aktas; Baris Kocaoglu; Arel Gereli; Ufuk Nalbantodlu; Osman Güven
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Functional outcome after operative treatment for ankle fractures in young athletes: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  David A Porter; Benjamin D May; Timothy Berney
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures.

Authors:  Nelson F SooHoo; Lucie Krenek; Michael J Eagan; Barkha Gurbani; Clifford Y Ko; David S Zingmond
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases.

Authors:  U Lindsjö
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of arthroscopy in articular fracture management: the lower limb.

Authors:  Luca Dei Giudici; Francesca Di Muzio; Carlo Bottegoni; Claudio Chillemi; Antonio Gigante
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-30

2.  Utilization of Arthroscopy During Ankle Fracture Fixation Among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Database.

Authors:  Alan G Shamrock; Zain M Khazi; Christopher N Carender; Annunziato Amendola; Natalie Glass; Kyle R Duchman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

3.  Ankle fracture configuration following treatment with and without arthroscopic-assisted reduction and fixation.

Authors:  Chayanin Angthong
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

4.  Microfracture provides better clinical results than debridement in the treatment of acute talar osteochondral lesions using arthroscopic assisted fixation of acute ankle fractures.

Authors:  Altuğ Duramaz; Emre Baca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Prevalence and associated factors of intra-articular lesions in acute ankle fractures evaluated by arthroscopy and clinical outcomes with minimum 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Xing-Zuo Chen; Ying Chen; Qian-Zheng Zhu; Li-Qiang Wang; Xiao-Dong Xu; Peng Lin
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Acute, isolated and unstable syndesmotic injuries are frequently associated with intra-articular pathologies.

Authors:  Kathrin Rellensmann; Cyrus Behzadi; John Usseglio; James Turner Vosseller; Wolfgang Böcker; Hans Polzer; Sebastian Felix Baumbach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment.

Authors:  Sebastian F Baumbach; Marcel Urresti-Gundlach; Mareen Braunstein; Lars Borgmann; Wolfgang Böcker; J Turner Vosseller; Hans Polzer
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 8.  Arthroscopically Assisted Internal Fixation of Foot and Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caroline E Williams; Peter Joo; Irvin Oh; Christopher Miller; John Y Kwon
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2021-01-21

9.  Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Kenneth S Smith; Katherine Drexelius; Shanthan Challa; Daniel K Moon; Joshua A Metzl; Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-03-02

10.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).

Authors:  Egemen Turhan; Murat Demirel; Alişan Daylak; Gazi Huri; Mahmut Nedim Doral; Derya Çelik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 1.511

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.