Sir,In their interesting study Wong report a preclinical and clinical correlation between the number of CD45−CD31+ cells in the peripheral blood and the growth of prostate cancer. Using flow cytometry and microscopy, they suggest that the large majority of CD45−CD31+ cells are more likely immature platelets and not circulating endothelial cells (CECs). Considering the wide antigenic overlap between CECs and platelets, and the possible aggregation/adhesion of platelets with CECs, we and others feel that in multiparametric flow cytometry the use of a cell viability stain and of a DNA-specific staining are necessary to discriminate DNA-containing CECs from DNA-free, CEC-derived macroparticles and platelets (Bertolini ; Mancuso and Bertolini, 2010; Mund ).When Ning used a nucleic acid stain to enumerate CECs in prostate cancerpatients receiving Bevacizumab, Docetaxel, Thalidomide and Predinisone, they reported a strong inverse correlation between changes in apoptotic CECs and PSA levels, suggesting that the drug combination may effectively inhibit tumour angiogenesis. Along this line, Strijbos used a nuclear stain to enumerate CECs in prostate cancerpatients receiving Docetaxel. They reported that CECs' kinetics during treatment, alone or in combination with other biomarkers, predicted survival in this cancer population.Data from Wong suggest that immature platelets deserve further clinical investigation as possible biomarkers of disease status in metastatic prostate cancer. One of the unique features of multiparametric flow cytometry is the possibility to enumerate in the same test-tube several different populations of cells, such as DNA-containing CECs, DNA-free, CEC-derived macroparticles and platelets. Several previous clinical studies involving antiangiogenic therapeutics in cancerpatients indicated that these different cell and platelet populations might serve as unique predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. We, therefore, recommend investigating them all in parallel in one test-tube using multiparametric flow cytometry technique.
Authors: Julie A Mund; Myka L Estes; Mervin C Yoder; David A Ingram; Jamie Case Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: M H Strijbos; J W Gratama; P I M Schmitz; C Rao; W Onstenk; G V Doyle; M C Miller; R de Wit; L W M M Terstappen; S Sleijfer Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Yang-Min Ning; James L Gulley; Philip M Arlen; Sukyung Woo; Seth M Steinberg; John J Wright; Howard L Parnes; Jane B Trepel; Min-Jung Lee; Yeong Sang Kim; Haihao Sun; Ravi A Madan; Lea Latham; Elizabeth Jones; Clara C Chen; William D Figg; William L Dahut Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C K E Wong; B Namdarian; J Chua; X Chin; R Speirs; T Nguyen; M Fankhauser; J Pedersen; A J Costello; N M Corcoran; C M Hovens Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: C K E Wong; B Namdarian; J Chua; X Chin; R Speirs; T Nguyen; M Fankhauser; J Pedersen; A J Costello; N M Corcoran; C M Hovens Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 7.640