Literature DB >> 23411849

Reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery: the role of on-pump and off-pump techniques on factors affecting hospital mortality and morbidity.

Ibrahim Kara1, Canturk Cakalagaoglu, Yasin Ay, Saleh Al Salehi, Mehmet Yanartas, Huseyin Anasiz, Cengiz Koksal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Short term results of on-pump and off-pump techniques in patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) were investigated in this study.
METHODS: A total of 14.430 patients have undergone isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in our clinic from 1998 to 2010. Of these patients, 105 patients who have undergone redo CABG, 53 (50.5%) were operated with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) and 52 (49.5%) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump). Early results for which on or off-pump techniques were independent risk factors were determined with logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Overall mortality in patients undergoing redo CABG was 12.3% with a 11.5% mortality in the off-pump group and 13.2% mortality in the on-pump group and the difference was not statistically significant (p >0.05). Blood product transfusion requirement (p <0.05, OR: 3.620, 95% CI: 1.295-10.119), new onset atrial fibrillation rhythm (AFR) (p <0.05, OR: 13.357, 95% CI: 1.656-107.721), prolonged ventilation (p <0.05, OR: 9.066, 95% CI: 1.091-75.323) and duration of hospitalization (p <0.01, OR: 5.252, 95% CI: 1.784-15.459) were significantly higher in the on-pump group. The number of patients with postoperative low cardiac output was significantly higher in the off-pump group (p <0.05, OR: 5.337, 95% CI: 1.094-26.043). The ratio of complete bypass was significantly higher in the on-pump group compared to the off-pump group (p <0.05, OR: 2.913, 95% CI: 1.204-7.046).
CONCLUSION: Despite the lower morbidity and mortality in the off-pump group, the rate of target vessel bypass grafting was lower. Off-pump technique may be considered as a safer option for cardiopulmonary bypass in the high risk population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23411849     DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.02043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1341-1098            Impact factor:   1.520


  6 in total

Review 1.  Redo coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Hitoshi Yaku; Kiyoshi Doi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-07

2.  Early health outcome and 10-year survival in patients undergoing redo coronary surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Vito D Bruno; Mustafa Zakkar; Filippo Rapetto; Asif Rathore; Roberto Marsico; Pierpaolo Chivasso; Raimondo Ascione
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Mid-Term Outcomes and Angiographic Patency of Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery.

Authors:  Suk Ho Sohn; Seung Hyun Kim; Ho Young Hwang; Ki-Bong Kim
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 4.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for octogenarians: A meta-analysis involving 146 372 patients.

Authors:  Lifu Sun; Meijing Zhou; Yumeng Ji; Xufeng Wang; Xiaowei Wang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.287

5.  A Meta-Analysis of Early, Mid-term and Long-Term Mortality of On-Pump vs. Off-Pump in Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Authors:  Shicheng Zhang; Siyuan Huang; Xieraili Tiemuerniyazi; Yangwu Song; Wei Feng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 6.  Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI.

Authors:  Ter-Er Kusu-Orkar; Kellan Masharani; Amer Harky; Andrew D Muir
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-08-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.