Literature DB >> 23411642

Which questionnaire is more effective for follow-up diagnosed subacromial impingement syndrome? A comparison of the responsiveness of SDQ, SPADI and WORC index.

Beril Dogu1, Fusun Sahin, Aslı Ozmaden, Figen Yilmaz, Banu Kuran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare responsiveness for the two region specific questionnaires Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) and Shoulder Pain Disability Index (SPADI) and the disease specific Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index in subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) receiving physical therapy or subacromial corticosteroid injection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with SIS diagnosed participated in this study. All the patients were provided either physical therapy or subacromial corticosteroid injection treatment. The SDQ, the SPADI and WORC index were assessed both at the beginning and after the 3rd month of treatment. The responsiveness of the three questionnaires was compared by using the effect size (ES), the standardized responsiveness mean (SRM) and Guyatt's method.
RESULTS: For both treatment groups there was no statistical difference observed between the pre- and post treatment measurement results versus improvement differences (p> 0.05). SDQ (ES=0.94; SRM=1.14; Guyatt value=0.95), SPADI (ES=1.55; SRM=2.14; Guyatt value=1.08), WORC index (ES=1.37; SRM=1.70; Guyatt value=1.15) were highly responsive for SIS.
CONCLUSIONS: The SDQ, the SPADI and the WORC index are suitable for measuring changes in patients with SIS. Of these three indices, the SDQ and the SPADI are more suitable for a rapid assessment whereas the WORC index is better in cases where a more detailed assessment including the psychological impact created by the functional status needs to be assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23411642     DOI: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-8127            Impact factor:   1.398


  5 in total

1.  Responsiveness and disease specificity of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index.

Authors:  Ronald N Wessel; Nienke Wolterbeek; Anouk J M Fermont; Loes Lavrijsen; Henk van Mameren; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21

2.  Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder.

Authors:  Ertan Şahinoğlu; Gülbin Ergin; Bayram Ünver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  SHOULDER EXTERNAL ROTATOR ECCENTRIC TRAINING VERSUS GENERAL SHOULDER EXERCISE FOR SUBACROMIAL PAIN SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Authors:  Eric J Chaconas; Morey J Kolber; William J Hanney; Matthew L Daugherty; Stanley H Wilson; Charles Sheets
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-12

4.  The Greek version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): translation, cultural adaptation, and validation in patients with rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  S Vrouva; C Batistaki; E Koutsioumpa; D Kostopoulos; E Stamoulis; G Kostopanagiotou
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-13

Review 5.  Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and "activity limitations": a systematic review.

Authors:  M Thoomes-de Graaf; G G M Scholten-Peeters; J M Schellingerhout; A M Bourne; R Buchbinder; M Koehorst; C B Terwee; A P Verhagen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.