Literature DB >> 23411619

Development of guideline-based indicators for patient-centredness in fertility care: what patients add.

E M E den Breejen1, W L D M Nelen, S F E Schol, J A M Kremer, R P M G Hermens.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What value can patients add to the development of guideline-based quality indicators for patient-centredness in fertility care? SUMMARY ANSWER: Infertile patients mainly select different indicators and value different dimensions of patient-centredness (e.g. information and communication and access to care) than professionals (e.g. coordination and integration of care) during an indicator development process. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Patient-centredness is an important dimension for the quality of fertility care. However, this dimension is not adequately evaluated by professionals, due to a lack of quality indicators. Furthermore, it is suggested that patients select different indicators for patient-centredness than professionals, although exact differences are unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: The RAND-modified Delphi method (a two-step systematic consensus method) was used to develop two sets of quality indicators for patient-centredness. Similarities and differences in the indicators as well as in aspects of patient-centredness between patients' and professionals' sets of indicators were analysed descriptively. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING,
METHODS: The development of quality indicators for patient-centredness was based on the national multidisciplinary Network Guideline on infertility. Two panels participated: one patients' panel (n = 19) and one multidisciplinary professionals' panel (n = 15). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: From 119 formulated potential indicators of patient-centredness, the patients' panel selected a representative set of 16, while the professionals' panel selected 18. Five indicators were included in both sets. These regarded the need to perform IUI at least 6 days a week; report on treatment outcomes and complications; report on results of semen analyses in a standardized way; counsel infertile couples about the positive effects on their chance of pregnancy of the elimination of a harmful lifestyle and provide information on the negative consequences for achieving a pregnancy in case of a high BMI. Both patients and professionals put highest value on potential indicators of information and communication in fertility care. Patients also emphasized accessibility of care, whereas professionals emphasized coordination and integration as important quality measures for patient-centredness in fertility care. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: First, the total number of developed indicators in the final set is relatively large (n = 29), which could be a first potential limitation in its use for accreditation and quality monitoring. Secondly, although panel members were asked to take reliability into account during the selection procedure, the indicators still need an evaluation of the measurability and the intra- and inter-observer reliability. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The final guideline-based indicator set consisting of 29 indicators represents a balanced set that is based on the expertise of all stakeholders, including patients. A next step should be the application of this set in a future practice test to assess the feasibility in daily practice. In our opinion, most quality indicators for patient-centredness could be used for monitoring and improving the quality of fertility care internationally, occasionally by a more broad interpretation (e.g. by replacing the general practitioners with other healthcare professionals engaged in the care process). STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by a research grant (number 150020015) from the Dutch Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) in a research programme on broadening and acceleration in multidisciplinary guideline development. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23411619     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

Review 1.  Practical Considerations for Using Online Methods to Engage Patients in Guideline Development.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Glen S Hazlewood; Holly L Peay; Ann Lucas; Ian Coulter; Arlene Fink; Dmitry Khodyakov
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Patient and Caregiver Prioritization of Palliative and End-of-Life Cancer Care Quality Measures.

Authors:  Claire E O'Hanlon; Karleen F Giannitrapani; Charlotta Lindvall; Raziel C Gamboa; Mark Canning; Steven M Asch; Melissa M Garrido; Anne M Walling; Karl A Lorenz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Burden of care is the primary reason why insured women terminate in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  Alice D Domar; Kristin Rooney; Michele R Hacker; Denny Sakkas; Laura E Dodge
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Online Modified-Delphi: a Potential Method for Continuous Patient Engagement Across Stages of Clinical Practice Guideline Development.

Authors:  Sean Grant; Courtney Armstrong; Dmitry Khodyakov
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method.

Authors:  Kayo Ueda; Shosuke Ohtera; Misato Kaso; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Measuring patient-centred system performance: a scoping review of patient-centred care quality indicators.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; Sadia Ahmed; Diane Lorenzetti; Rachel J Jolley; Kimberly Manalili; Sandra Zelinsky; Hude Quan; Mingshan Lu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Updating quality indicators for low-risk labour care in Japan using current clinical practice guidelines: a modified Delphi method.

Authors:  Kayo Ueda; Misato Kaso; Shosuke Ohtera; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  International consensus: ovarian tissue cryopreservation in young Turner syndrome patients: outcomes of an ethical Delphi study including 55 experts from 16 different countries.

Authors:  M J Schleedoorn; B H Mulder; D D M Braat; C C M Beerendonk; R Peek; W L D M Nelen; E Van Leeuwen; A A E M Van der Velden; K Fleischer; On Behalf Of The Turner Fertility Expert Panel
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Bridging the gap between patient needs and quality indicators: a qualitative study with chronic heart failure patients.

Authors:  Ines Baudendistel; Stefan Noest; Frank Peters-Klimm; Heidrun Herzberg; Martin Scherer; Eva Blozik; Stefanie Joos
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.711

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.