Literature DB >> 23410231

Resistance to APC and SHBG levels during use of a four-phasic oral contraceptive containing dienogest and estradiol valerate: a randomized controlled trial.

M Raps1, F Rosendaal, B Ballieux, J Rosing, S Thomassen, F Helmerhorst, H van Vliet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of combined oral contraceptives is associated with a 3- to 6-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. This increased risk depends on the estrogen dose as well as the progestogen type of combined oral contraceptives. Thrombin generation-based activated protein C resistance (APC resistance) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels predict the thrombotic risk of a combined hormonal contraceptive. Recently, a four-phasic oral contraceptive containing dienogest (DNG) and estradiol valerate (E2V) has been marketed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the thrombotic risk of the DNG/E2V oral contraceptive by comparing APC resistance by measuring normalized APC sensitivity ratios (nAPCsr) and SHBG levels in users of oral contraceptives containing dienogest and estradiol valerate (DNG/E2V) and oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol (LNG/EE).
METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized, open label, parallel-group study in 74 women using DNG/E2V or LNG/EE, and measured nAPCsr and SHBG levels in every phase of the regimen of DNG/E2V.
RESULTS: During the pill cycle SHBG levels did not differ between DNG/E2V users and LNG/EE users. nAPCsr levels were overall slightly lower in DNG/E2V users than in LNG/EE users, mean difference -0.44 (95% CI, -1.04 to 0.17) for day 2, -0.20 (95% CI, -0.76 to 0.37) for day 7, -0.27 (95% CI, -0.81 to 0.28) for day 24 and -0.34 (95% CI, -0.91 to 0.24) for day 26.
CONCLUSION: No statistical significant differences in nAPCsr and SHBG levels were found between users of the oral contraceptive containing DNG/E2V and LNG/EE, suggesting a comparable thrombotic risk.
© 2013 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23410231     DOI: 10.1111/jth.12172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  5 in total

Review 1.  Choosing a combined oral contraceptive pill.

Authors:  Mary Stewart; Kirsten Black
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 2.  Noncontraceptive benefits of the estradiol valerate/dienogest combined oral contraceptive: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Marco Serrani; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-02

3.  Venous thrombosis and hormonal contraception: what's new with estradiol-based hormonal contraceptives?

Authors:  Franca Fruzzetti; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2018-11-08

4.  Heparins: A Shift of Paradigm.

Authors:  H Coenraad Hemker; Raed Al Dieri; Suzette Béguin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-15

5.  Use of oral contraceptives for management of acne vulgaris and hirsutism in women of reproductive and late reproductive age.

Authors:  Radosław Słopień; Ewa Milewska; Piotr Rynio; Błażej Męczekalski
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2018-04-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.