Literature DB >> 23410117

Surgeon fatigue and postural stability: is robotic better than laparoscopic surgery?

Kristina A Butler1, Vasilis E Kapetanakis, Benn E Smith, Mohammed Sanjak, Joseph L Verheijde, Yu-Hui H Chang, Paul M Magtibay, Javier F Magrina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare muscular fatigue and postural stability of surgeons before and after laparoscopic and robotic surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The design of this study is Class II. A consecutive cohort of patients presenting at an academic tertiary-care center for scheduled gynecologic surgery was used. Routine surgical care was examined with testing of surgeon fatigue and postural measures before and after the procedure. Motor fatigue was measured using a quantitative grip dynamometer, and postural stability was measured using a nondominant, single-leg stance. A subjective fatigue score was recorded following surgery.
RESULTS: Primary surgeons completed testing before and after 56 surgeries. A trend toward decline in postural stability was observed more in the laparoscopy group than in the robotic group (P=.29). The fatigue index and subjective fatigue scores were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar changes in postural stability and muscular strength were observed following laparoscopic and robotic surgery. The optimal measurement tool to capture surgical fatigue remains elusive. Fatigue differences may have been more pronounced if surgical procedure degree of difficulty had been more consistent between groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23410117     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

1.  Effects of Visual Stress on Postural Control during Simulated Laparoscopy: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Yifan Li; Kristin Chrouser; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet       Date:  2019-11-20

2.  Comparison of fatigue accumulated during and after prolonged robotic and laparoscopic surgical methods: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Manuel González-Sánchez; Ivan González-Poveda; Santiago Mera-Velasco; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Dalager; Karen Søgaard; Katrine Tholstrup Bech; Ole Mogensen; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Megan E McDonald; Pedro T Ramirez; Mark F Munsell; Marilyn Greer; William M Burke; Wendel T Naumann; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Expert consensus on robotic surgery for colorectal cancer (2015 edition).

Authors:  Jianmin Xu; Xinyu Qin
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-25

6.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Gareth Ambler; Rachael Sarpong; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Melanie Tan; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Louise Goodwin; Norman R Williams; John McGrath; Edward Rowe; Anthony Koupparis; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.