Literature DB >> 23410019

Patients' priorities in assessing organisational aspects of a general dental practice.

Rutger E Sonneveld1, Wolter G Brands, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Jos V M Welie, Gert-Jan Truin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore which organisational aspects are considered most important by patients when assessing a general dental practice, and which patients' characteristics influence their views on these aspects by a paper questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was handed out to a sample of 5,000 patients in the Netherlands.
RESULTS: The response rate was 63%. Six organisational aspects out of a list of 41 aspects were valued as most important by at least 50%. In decreasing order of importance, these were: accessibility by telephone; continuing education for general dental practitioners; Dutch-speaking general dental practitioners; in-office waiting times; information about treatments offered; and waiting lists. For four out of these six aspects, respondents' age and education significantly influenced their preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: Aspects concerning the infrastructure of a general dental practice were chosen more often than aspects such as working to professional standards, working according to protocols and guidelines, quality assessment and guaranteed treatment outcomes. The findings will enable organisations to increase the transparency of health-care delivery systems to focus on those organisational aspects of dental practices that patients themselves consider most important. These findings can also assist general dental practitioners in adapting their organisational services to the preferences of patients or specific patient groups.
© 2013 FDI World Dental Federation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23410019      PMCID: PMC9374956          DOI: 10.1111/idj.12001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.607


  20 in total

1.  Influence of key variables on the patients' choice of a physician.

Authors:  Raj Arora; Joseph Singer; Alisha Arora
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.926

2.  What's important in choosing a primary care physician: an analysis of consumer response.

Authors:  Nabil Razzouk; Victoria Seitz; Janet Marie Webb
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv       Date:  2004

3.  Salzburg statement on shared decision making.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-03-22

Review 4.  Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material.

Authors:  E S Nilsen; H T Myrhaug; M Johansen; S Oliver; A D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

5.  Measuring client experiences in long-term care in the Netherlands: a pilot study with the Consumer Quality Index Long-term Care.

Authors:  Mattanja Triemstra; Sjenny Winters; Rudolf B Kool; Therese A Wiegers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Patients' experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Marc Wallace; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-12

7.  Prevalence of dental fear and phobia relative to other fear and phobia subtypes.

Authors:  Floor M D Oosterink; Ad de Jongh; Johan Hoogstraten
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.612

8.  Perceptions of how the Internet has impacted on dentistry.

Authors:  I G Chestnutt; K Reynolds
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Which aspects of non-clinical quality of care are most important? Results from WHO's general population surveys of "health systems responsiveness" in 41 countries.

Authors:  Nicole Valentine; Charles Darby; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Patient experience of access to primary care: identification of predictors in a national patient survey.

Authors:  Evangelos Kontopantelis; Martin Roland; David Reeves
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.