| Literature DB >> 23409983 |
Joost A M Raeymaekers1, Pascal I Hablützel, Arnout F Grégoir, Jolien Bamps, Anna K Roose, Maarten P M Vanhove, Maarten Van Steenberge, Antoine Pariselle, Tine Huyse, Jos Snoeks, Filip A M Volckaert.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adaptation to different ecological environments is thought to drive ecological speciation. This phenomenon culminates in the radiations of cichlid fishes in the African Great Lakes. Multiple characteristic traits of cichlids, targeted by natural or sexual selection, are considered among the driving factors of these radiations. Parasites and pathogens have been suggested to initiate or accelerate speciation by triggering both natural and sexual selection. Three prerequisites for parasite-driven speciation can be inferred from ecological speciation theory. The first prerequisite is that different populations experience divergent infection levels. The second prerequisite is that these infection levels cause divergent selection and facilitate adaptive divergence. The third prerequisite is that parasite-driven adaptive divergence facilitates the evolution of reproductive isolation. Here we investigate the first and the second prerequisite in allopatric chromatically differentiated lineages of the rock-dwelling cichlid Tropheus spp. from southern Lake Tanganyika (Central Africa). Macroparasite communities were screened in eight populations belonging to five different colour morphs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23409983 PMCID: PMC3599415 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-41
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1A) Sites of eight populations sampled along the Zambian shore of Lake Tanganyika in August-September 2011. Black and sand-coloured shorelines indicate suitable rocky and unsuitable sand shores, respectively. Blue lines represent rivers, and the yellow line represents political borders. The six easternmost sites were resampled in August-September 2012. B) Bayesian analysis of the genetic structure of the eight populations. As previous genetic studies on these populations revealed that populations largely cluster according to colour morph [55,56,58,59], colour morph was used in the analysis as prior information. The colour of each of the four cluster corresponds to the predominant colour of the assigned individuals (i.e., red/orange for Chilanga and Linangu, blue for Tumbi and Katoto, light olive for Mbita Island and Wonzye Point, and dark olive for Muzumwa and Toby’s place). C) Visualization of significant differences (after correction for multiple testing) between neighbouring Tropheus populations for infection presence, abundance, infection intensity and parasite community composition. Full bars indicate that significant differences were observed in both sampling years. Dashed bars indicate that significant differences were only observed, or only investigated, in one sampling year.
Sampling site, substrate type, latitude, longitude, year, sample size and prevalence (%) for eight populations sampled along the Zambian shore of Lake Tanganyika in August-September 2011 and 2012
| | | | | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chilanga (r/s) | 08° 33’ 22.4” S | 30° 37’ 09.7” E | 2011 | 50/40 | 92 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 5/4 | 2 | 97.5 | 57.5 | 0 |
| Linangu (r/s) | 08° 32’ 03.5” S | 30° 38’ 25.2” E | 2011 | 50/40 | 94 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0/0 | 4 | 81.4 | 45 | 0 |
| Tumbi (R/s) | 08° 42’ 10.7” S | 30° 55’ 20.9” E | 2011 | 50/41 | 73.47 | 16.33 | 0 | 0 | 7.32/6 | 4 | 88.37 | 24.39 | 0 |
| 2012 | 40/30 | 50 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13.3/7.5 | 5 | 70 | 33.33 | 0 | |||
| Katoto (R/ns) | 08° 47’ 51.6” S | 31° 01” 11.8” E | 2011 | 55/40 | 30.77 | 13.46 | 7.27 | 1.92 | 0/1.82 | 5.45 | 100 | 47.5 | 2.5 |
| 2012 | 40/31 | 72.50 | 25 | 7.50 | 2.50 | 0/2.5 | 12.50 | 93.55 | 29.03 | 0 | |||
| Mbita Island (r/s) | 08° 44’ 57.1” S | 31° 05’ 14.2” E | 2011 | 60/42 | 86.21 | 3.45 | 1.69 | 0 | 0/0 | 1.67 | 79.07 | 35.71 | 2.38 |
| 2012 | 41/30 | 92.68 | 4.88 | 9.76 | 0 | 10/2.44 | 2.44 | 96.67 | 46.67 | 3.33 | |||
| Wonzye Point (r-sr/ss) | 08° 43’ 07.6” S | 31° 08’ 12.6” E | 2011 | 50/40 | 86 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2.5/0 | 4 | 95.56 | 40 | 0 |
| 2012 | 40/29 | 85 | 15 | 2.5 | 0 | 3.45/0 | 5 | 86.21 | 27.59 | 3.44 | |||
| Muzumwa (r-sr/sss) | 08° 42’ 05.7” S | 31° 11’ 59.8” E | 2011 | 50/45 | 95.91 | 10.20 | 2 | 0 | 0/4 | 20 | 95.56 | 31.11 | 0 |
| 2012 | 40/30 | 92.5 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 6.67/0 | 20 | 90 | 36.67 | 0 | |||
| Toby’s place (r/ss) | 08° 37’ 18.9” S | 31° 11’ 59.9” E | 2011 | 50/40 | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 4 | 76.19 | 25 | 2.5 |
| 2012 | 40/30 | 77.5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0/0 | 2.50 | 66.67 | 30 | 3.44 | |||
Substrate type is categorized according to rock (r: small rocks; R: large rocks; sr: solid rock) and sediment (ns: no sediment; s: few sediment; ss: some sediment; sss: much sediment). NT: total number of individuals screened for parasites. NG: number of individuals screened for parasites on the gills. Groups of parasites which are known from Lake Tanganyika fishes [87], but which were not observed in this study, include pentastomids [88,89], cymothoid parasitic isopods, lernaeid copepods [90], cestodes [89,91] and leeches [92,93]. Of these, the isopods and copepods ( [90]; Vanhove pers. obs.), pentastomids [94], cestodes ( [95]; Vanhove & Pariselle, pers. obs.) were also observed in cichlids, as well as bivalves on the gills (Vanhove & Grégoir, pers. obs.) and the ancyrocephalid monogenean Enterogyrus sp. in the digestive tract (Pariselle, Vanhove, Bamps, Grégoir, Hablützel & Raeymaekers, unpublished data).
Mean abundance/median intensity in eight populations sampled along the Zambian shore of Lake Tanganyika in August-September 2011 and 2012
| | | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chilanga | 2011 | 5.74 / 5 | 0.20 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.05 / 1 | 0.04 / 1 | 0.02 / 1 | 20.38 / 17 | 1.75 / 2 | 0.00 / - |
| Linangu | 2011 | 6.54 / 5 | 0.26 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.08 / 2 | 3.44 / 4 | 0.60 / 1 | 0.00 / - |
| Tumbi | 2011 | 1.57 / 2 | 0.22 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.10 / 1 | 0.06 / 1 | 0.12 / 3 | 6.81 / 5.5 | 0.46 / 1 | 0.00 / - |
| | 2012 | 1.43 / 2 | 0.00 / - | 0.13 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.13 / 1 | 0.08 / 1 | 0.08 / 1.5 | 5.13 / 3 | 0.67 / 2 | 0.00 / - |
| Katoto | 2011 | 0.48 / 1 | 0.17 / 1 | 0.07 / 1 | 0.02 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.02 / 1 | 0.07 / 1 | 15.07 / 11 | 0.80 / 1 | 0.03 / 1 |
| | 2012 | 3.93 / 4 | 0.48 / 1 | 0.13 / 1 | 0.03 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.03 / 1 | 0.25 / 2 | 14.06 / 10 | 0.48 / 1 | 0.00 / - |
| Mbita Island | 2011 | 5.21 / 4 | 0.05 / 1.5 | 0.02 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.02 / 1 | 5.44 / 6 | 0.83 / 1 | 0.05 / 2 |
| | 2012 | 10.95 / 9.5 | 0.05 / 1 | 0.22 / 2 | 0.00 / - | 0.1 / 1 | 0.02 / 1 | 0.05 / 2 | 15.8 / 11 | 1.17 / 2 | 0.03 / 1 |
| Wonzye | 2011 | 3.48 / 4 | 0.10 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.03 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.08 / 2 | 6.8 / 6 | 0.63 / 1 | 0.00 / - |
| | 2012 | 4.88 / 5 | 0.15 / 1 | 0.05 / 2 | 0.00 / - | 0.03 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.08 / 1.5 | 6.55 / 5 | 0.41 / 1 | 0.03 / 1 |
| Muzumwa | 2011 | 6.67 / 4 | 0.12 / 1 | 0.02 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.06 / 1.5 | 0.38 / 1 | 14.47 / 10 | 0.53 / 1 | 0.00 / - |
| | 2012 | 6.15 / 5 | 0.05 / 1 | 0.03 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.17 / 2.5 | 0.00 / - | 0.48 / 2 | 12.57 / 11 | 0.5 / 1 | 0.00 / - |
| Toby’s place | 2011 | 6.62 / 5 | 0.06 / 1 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.02 / 1 | 0.08 / 2 | 2.98 / 3 | 0.40 / 1.5 | 0.03 / 1 |
| 2012 | 6.38 /7 | 0.05 / 1 | 0.13 / 2.5 | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.00 / - | 0.03 / 1 | 4.17 / 4 | 0.43 / 1 | 0.03 / 1 | |
Fixed effects of general and generalized linear models for infection levels in eight populations
| | | | | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acanthocephalans | site | 7 | 605/483 | 9.01 | 23.46 | 11.92 | |||
| | day | 2 | 605/483 | 0.76 | 0.4673 | 1.02 | 0.3622 | 01.25 | 0.2886 |
| | sex | 1 | 605/483 | 0.01 | 0.9100 | 0.04 | 0.8484 | 0.04 | 0.8351 |
| | SL | 1 | 605/483 | 12.62 | 57.06 | 47.92 | |||
| | year(site) | 6 | 605/483 | 5.02 | 7.57 | 5.02 | |||
| Nematodes | site | 7 | 605/47 | 2.38 | 2.64 | 1.32 | 0.2640 | ||
| | day | 2 | 605/47 | 0.63 | 0.5336 | 0.78 | 0.4591 | 2.41 | 0.1005 |
| | sex | 1 | 605/47 | 1.09 | 0.2974 | 1.36 | 0.2434 | 1.17 | 0.2843 |
| | SL | 1 | 605/47 | 0.10 | 0.7557 | 0.05 | 0.8185 | 1.39 | 0.2436 |
| | year(site) | 6 | 605/47 | 0.89 | 0.5011 | 2.19 | 0.74 | 0.6009 | |
| site | 7 | 616/24 | 3.95 | 5.47 | 0.83 | 0.5692 | |||
| | day | 2 | 616/24 | 0.90 | 0.4091 | 0.37 | 0.6927 | 4.88 | |
| | sex | 1 | 616/24 | 0.30 | 0.5811 | 0.09 | 0.7607 | 1.16 | 0.2926 |
| | SL | 1 | 616/24 | 0.26 | 0.6093 | 0.27 | 0.6016 | 1.25 | 0.2751 |
| . | year(site) | 6 | 616/24 | 0.35 | 0.9071 | 0.60 | 0.7344 | 0.93 | 0.4933 |
| site | 7 | 476/418 | 2.85 | 18.85 | 15.14 | ||||
| | day | 2 | 476/418 | 2.80 | 0.0617 | 5.50 | 2.54 | 0.0803 | |
| | sex | 1 | 476/418 | 3.62 | 0.0578 | 7.58 | 4.00 | ||
| | SL | 1 | 476/418 | 6.60 | 77.90 | 74.38 | |||
| | year(site) | 6 | 476/418 | 2.80 | 3.68 | 1.73 | 0.1131 | ||
| site | 7 | 476/158 | 1.73 | 0.1001 | 2.40 | 1.86 | 0.0792 | ||
| | day | 2 | 476/158 | 0.70 | 0.4984 | 0.14 | 0.8729 | 1.36 | 0.2602 |
| | sex | 1 | 476/158 | 0.15 | 0.6978 | 0.10 | 0.7479 | 0.00 | 0.9537 |
| | SL | 1 | 476/158 | 0.58 | 0.4485 | 3.28 | 0.0708 | 5.30 | |
| year(site) | 6 | 476/158 | 0.70 | 0.6489 | 0.55 | 0.7696 | 0.23 | 0.9667 | |
Fixed effects included sampling site, processing day, sex, standard length (SL), and sampling year (nested in site). Observer effects were included as random (not shown), except for Gyrodactylus sp. for which there was only one observer. The model for infection presence assumes a binomial distribution and models the logit of the probability of infection. For the models for abundance and infection intensity, the dependent variable was square-root transformed. Note that the denominator degrees of freedom (Den DF) are higher for the infection presence and abundance model (before the dash) than for the infection intensity model (after the dash). P-values in bold indicate significance at α = 0.05.
Figure 2Prevalence (left), mean abundance (middle; square-root transformed) and mean infection intensity (right; square-root transformed) of acanthocephalans, nematodes, , , and in eight populations from southern Lake Tanganyika. Error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 3Isolation-by-distance in eight populations from southern Lake Tanganyika. A) Geographical distance along the shoreline vs. genetic differentiation as quantified with pairwise D; B) Geographical distance along the shoreline vs. standardized variance in allele frequencies (GST).
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance on Hellinger distances between parasite communities in individuals from eight (2011) or six (2012) populations
| 2011 | site | 7 | 307 | 16.84 | 2.41 | 12.22 | 0.21 | |
| day | 2 | 307 | 0.81 | 0.40 | 2.05 | 0.01 | 0.08 | |
| sex | 1 | 307 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 1.18 | 0.003 | 0.28 | |
| SL | 1 | 307 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 2.04 | 0.005 | 0.11 | |
| 2012 | site | 5 | 168 | 4.42 | 0.88 | 3.05 | 0.08 | |
| day | 1 | 168 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.001 | 0.97 | |
| sex | 1 | 168 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 2.24 | 0.01 | 0.07 | |
| SL | 1 | 168 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.99 | 0.005 | 0.39 |
The model included sampling site, processing day, sex, and standard length (SL). P-values in bold indicate significance at α = 0.05.
Mantel correlations between parasite community differentiation (Hellinger distance), the genetic structure of host populations (pairwise D and pairwise G), and geographical distance along the shoreline
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 0.13 | 0.2803 | 0.37 | 0.1396 |
| GST | 0.02 | 0.4255 | 0.20 | 0.2589 |
| Geographical distance | −0.14 | 0.6983 | 0.55 | |
Significant P-values are in bold.
Figure 4Determinants of parasite community differentiation (Hellinger distance) among eight populations from southern Lake Tanganyika. A) Genetic differentiation as quantified with pairwise D vs. Hellinger distance; B) Standardized variance in allele frequencies (GST) vs. Hellinger distance; C) Geographical distance along the shoreline vs. Hellinger distance; D) Hellinger distance as quantified in 2011 vs. Hellinger distance as quantified in 2012. Panels A, B and C combine data from 2011 (black dots) with data from 2012 (white dots). Dashed lines (superimposed on non-significant relationships) were obtained with a lowess function. Full lines (superimposed on significant relationships) represent least-square linear regression lines.