Literature DB >> 23409524

Risk of uterine rupture following locked vs unlocked single-layer closure.

Igor Hudic1, Emmanuel Bujold, Zlatan Fatusic, Stéphanie Roberge, Amer Mandzic, Jasenko Fatusic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of uterine scar disruption after a locked versus an unlocked single-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision at a previous cesarean.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a population where both locked and unlocked single-layer closure are commonly used. All singleton pregnancies at 24 weeks' gestation or more with a previous single cesarean were included. Rate of uterine scar disruption (complete uterine rupture and uterine scar dehiscence) were compared between women with a previous locked and those with a previous unlocked single-layer closure of the uterus.
RESULTS: Out of 388 women included in the study, 272 had a previous unlocked single-layer closure and 116 had a locked single-layer closure. We found no significant difference in the rate of uterine scar disruption between the two groups (5.9% vs 8.6%, p = 0.32).
CONCLUSION: Locking a single-layer closure was not associated with an increase rate of uterine scar disruption at the next pregnancy in our retrospective analysis. A randomized trial should be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23409524     DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.412-414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Arch        ISSN: 0350-199X


  2 in total

1.  The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section.

Authors:  C V Hegde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-07-23

2.  Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.

Authors:  Guluzar Arzu Turan; Esra Bahar Gur; Sumeyra Tatar; Ayse Gokduman; Serkan Guclu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.088

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.