BACKGROUND: Fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is limited in its evaluation of brain tumors due to the high basal activity of the cerebral cortex and white matter. Carbon-11 methionine ((11)C MET) has little uptake under normal conditions. We prospectively investigated the uptake of (18)F FDG and (11)C MET PET in patients with craniopharyngioma prior to proton therapy. METHODS: Ten patients newly diagnosed with craniopharyngioma underwent PET imaging using (18)F FDG and (11)C MET. PET and MRI studies were registered to help identify tumor volume. Measurements of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) were taken of the tumor and compared with noninvolved left frontal background white matter using a paired t-test. Uptake was graded using a 4-point scale. RESULTS: Median patient age was 9 years (range 5-19). Seven patients were diagnosed by pathology, 1 by cyst fluid aspiration, and 2 by neuroimaging. Median FDG SUV(max) for tumor and background were 2.65 and 3.2, respectively. Median MET SUV(max) for tumor and background were 2.2 and 1, respectively. There was a significant difference between MET tumor SUV(max) and MET background SUV(max) (P = .0001). The difference between FDG tumor SUV(max) and FDG background SUV(max) was not significant (P = .3672). CONCLUSION: (11)C MET PET uptake is significantly greater within the tumor compared with noninvolved background white matter, making it more useful than FDG PET in identifying active tumor in patients with craniopharyngioma. Future work will focus on using (11)C MET PET to discriminate between active and inactive tumor after irradiation.
BACKGROUND:Fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is limited in its evaluation of brain tumors due to the high basal activity of the cerebral cortex and white matter. Carbon-11 methionine ((11)C MET) has little uptake under normal conditions. We prospectively investigated the uptake of (18)F FDG and (11)C MET PET in patients with craniopharyngioma prior to proton therapy. METHODS: Ten patients newly diagnosed with craniopharyngioma underwent PET imaging using (18)F FDG and (11)C MET. PET and MRI studies were registered to help identify tumor volume. Measurements of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) were taken of the tumor and compared with noninvolved left frontal background white matter using a paired t-test. Uptake was graded using a 4-point scale. RESULTS: Median patient age was 9 years (range 5-19). Seven patients were diagnosed by pathology, 1 by cyst fluid aspiration, and 2 by neuroimaging. Median FDG SUV(max) for tumor and background were 2.65 and 3.2, respectively. Median MET SUV(max) for tumor and background were 2.2 and 1, respectively. There was a significant difference between MET tumor SUV(max) and MET background SUV(max) (P = .0001). The difference between FDGtumor SUV(max) and FDG background SUV(max) was not significant (P = .3672). CONCLUSION: (11)C MET PET uptake is significantly greater within the tumor compared with noninvolved background white matter, making it more useful than FDG PET in identifying active tumor in patients with craniopharyngioma. Future work will focus on using (11)C MET PET to discriminate between active and inactive tumor after irradiation.
Authors: Benoit Pirotte; Serge Goldman; Patrick Van Bogaert; Philippe David; David Wikler; Sandrine Rorive; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: L A O'Tuama; P C Phillips; Q R Smith; Y Uno; R F Dannals; A A Wilson; H T Ravert; S Loats; H A Loats; H N Wagner Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Meri Utriainen; Liisa Metsähonkala; Toivo T Salmi; Tapio Utriainen; Hannu Kalimo; Helena Pihko; Anne Mäkipernaa; Arja Harila-Saari; Sirkku Jyrkkiö; Jukka Laine; Kjell Någren; Heikki Minn Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Benoit Pirotte; Serge Goldman; Nicolas Massager; Philippe David; David Wikler; Arlette Vandesteene; Isabelle Salmon; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 10.057