Literature DB >> 23408814

Recovery of absorptive function of the reticulo-rumen and total tract barrier function in beef cattle after short-term feed restriction.

S Zhang1, J R Aschenbach, D R Barreda, G B Penner.   

Abstract

Our objective was to determine if the severity of short-term feed restriction (FR) affects the timeline for recovery of the absorptive function of the reticulo-rumen and barrier function of the total gastrointestinal tract in beef cattle. Eighteen ruminally cannulated and ovariectomized Angus × Hereford heifers were housed in individual pens. Heifers were blocked by initial BW into 3 blocks and, within block, randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments that differed in the severity of FR: heifers were restricted to 75, 50, or 25% of ad libitum intake. Treatments were imposed during a 5-d period of FR followed by 3 consecutive wk of recovery (REC1, REC2, and REC3). Throughout the experiment heifers were fed the same diet (60% forage:40% concentrate) for ad libitum intake (except during FR) and water was available at all times. Dry matter intake was measured daily and ruminal pH was recorded every 2 min during FR and recovery periods. Ruminal fluid and blood samples were collected on d 3 of the FR and d 5 of REC1 and REC3. Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) absorption rates were evaluated on the last day of FR, REC1, and REC3 using the temporarily isolated and washed reticulo-rumen technique. On d 2 of FR and d 4 of REC1 and REC3, a 1 L solution of Cr-EDTA (180 mM) was dosed into the rumen followed by 48 h of total urine collection. Dry matter intake (% BW) increased rapidly in REC1 for heifers restricted to 75 and 50%; however, heifers restricted to 25% needed at least 2 wk to recover (treatment × period; P < 0.001). Regardless of the severity of FR, the duration that pH < 5.5 was the highest during REC1 (period P < 0.001). However, an interaction was found for the acidosis index, with pH × min/kg of DMI being greatest in heifers restricted to 25% on d 1 of the recovery period. A treatment × period interaction was found for the absolute absorption rate (mmol/h) of total SCFA (P = 0.009). The total SCFA absorption rate was not different for heifers restricted to 75 and 50% across periods, whereas an increase from FR and REC1 to REC3 was detected for heifers restricted to 25% of ad libitum intake. A treatment effect was observed for urinary Cr output (P = 0.027) indicating that heifers previously restricted to 25% of ad libitum intake had greater Cr excretion in urine during FR and recovery. This study indicates that severe FR negatively affects the time required for recovery of reticulo-rumen absorptive function and total tract barrier function. Another important finding is that regardless of severity, FR increases risk for ruminal acidosis when heifers have free access to feed after FR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23408814     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Effect of ruminal acidosis and short-term low feed intake on indicators of gastrointestinal barrier function in Holstein steers.

Authors:  Rae-Leigh A Pederzolli; Andrew G Van Kessel; John Campbell; Steve Hendrick; Katie M Wood; Gregory B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Oversupplying metabolizable protein in late gestation for beef cattle: effects on postpartum ruminal fermentation, blood metabolites, skeletal muscle catabolism, colostrum composition, milk yield and composition, and calf growth performance.

Authors:  Koryn S Hare; Katie M Wood; Carolyn Fitzsimmons; Gregory B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Evidence of In Vivo Absorption of Lactate and Modulation of Short Chain Fatty Acid Absorption from the Reticulorumen of Non-Lactating Cattle Fed High Concentrate Diets.

Authors:  Muhammad Qumar; Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-Ard; Poulad Pourazad; Stefanie U Wetzels; Fenja Klevenhusen; Wolfgang Kandler; Jörg R Aschenbach; Qendrim Zebeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of conditioning, source, and rest on indicators of stress in beef cattle transported by road.

Authors:  Daniela M Meléndez; Sonia Marti; Derek B Haley; Timothy D Schwinghamer; Karen S Schwartzkopf-Genswein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Elliptical and linear relationships with rumen temperature support a homeorhetic trajectory for DMI during recovery of feedlot cattle exposed to moderate heat load.

Authors:  Megan L Sullivan; Gene Wijffels; A George; Yousef A Al-Hosni; Joseph C W Olm; John B Gaughan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

6.  Illumina MiSeq Phylogenetic Amplicon Sequencing Shows a Large Reduction of an Uncharacterised Succinivibrionaceae and an Increase of the Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii Clade in Feed Restricted Cattle.

Authors:  Matthew Sean McCabe; Paul Cormican; Kate Keogh; Aaron O'Connor; Eoin O'Hara; Rafael Alejandro Palladino; David Anthony Kenny; Sinéad Mary Waters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Examination of the molecular control of ruminal epithelial function in response to dietary restriction and subsequent compensatory growth in cattle.

Authors:  Emma O'Shea; Sinéad M Waters; Kate Keogh; Alan K Kelly; David A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-15

8.  The Use of Biochemical Measurements to Identify Pre-Slaughter Stress in Pasture Finished Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Kate M W Loudon; Garth Tarr; David W Pethick; Ian J Lean; Rod Polkinghorne; Maddison Mason; Frank R Dunshea; Graham E Gardner; Peter McGilchrist
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Effects of short-term fasting on ruminal pH and volatile fatty acids in cattle fed high-roughage versus high-concentrate diets.

Authors:  Hitoshi Mizuguchi; Yo-Han Kim; Tomomi Kanazawa; Kentaro Ikuta; Shigeru Sato
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 1.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.