BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that pheochromocytoma is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. This is however not based on studies with an appropriate control group of patients with essential hypertension. AIM OF THE STUDY: We examined whether patients with pheochromocytoma have an excess cardiovascular morbidity as compared to hypertensive patients. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study we reviewed the medical charts of 109 pheochromocytoma patients for cardiovascular events within 5 years prior to the diagnosis. These patients were matched to control patients with essential hypertension for gender and year of birth and diagnosis. Outcome variables were ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular accidents, and transient ischemic attacks. Classical cardiovascular risk factors were also assessed. RESULTS: A significantly higher rate of patients with pheochromocytoma suffered a cardiovascular event (13.8%; 95% confidence interval: 7.9%-21.6%) as compared to hypertensive patients (1.1%, 95% confidence interval: 0.1%-3.9%) (P < .001). Blood pressure level was lower in pheochromocytoma patients (153/91 ± 35/15 mm Hg) than in hypertensive patients (170/103 ± 18/8 mm Hg) (P < .001), even after correction for use of antihypertensive medication (P < .02). The difference in event rates could not be attributed to differences in other cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Pheochromocytoma patients have a clearly higher rate of cardiovascular events than patients with essential hypertension. This cannot be attributed to differences in blood pressure or other cardiovascular risk factors. The most likely explanation for the excess event rate is the prolonged exposure to the toxic effects of tumoral catecholamines. These data underpin the importance of a timely diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma.
BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that pheochromocytoma is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. This is however not based on studies with an appropriate control group of patients with essential hypertension. AIM OF THE STUDY: We examined whether patients with pheochromocytoma have an excess cardiovascular morbidity as compared to hypertensivepatients. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study we reviewed the medical charts of 109 pheochromocytomapatients for cardiovascular events within 5 years prior to the diagnosis. These patients were matched to control patients with essential hypertension for gender and year of birth and diagnosis. Outcome variables were ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular accidents, and transient ischemic attacks. Classical cardiovascular risk factors were also assessed. RESULTS: A significantly higher rate of patients with pheochromocytoma suffered a cardiovascular event (13.8%; 95% confidence interval: 7.9%-21.6%) as compared to hypertensivepatients (1.1%, 95% confidence interval: 0.1%-3.9%) (P < .001). Blood pressure level was lower in pheochromocytomapatients (153/91 ± 35/15 mm Hg) than in hypertensivepatients (170/103 ± 18/8 mm Hg) (P < .001), even after correction for use of antihypertensive medication (P < .02). The difference in event rates could not be attributed to differences in other cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS:Pheochromocytomapatients have a clearly higher rate of cardiovascular events than patients with essential hypertension. This cannot be attributed to differences in blood pressure or other cardiovascular risk factors. The most likely explanation for the excess event rate is the prolonged exposure to the toxic effects of tumoral catecholamines. These data underpin the importance of a timely diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma.
Authors: Laurent Brunaud; Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi; Eric Mirallie; Marco Raffaelli; Menno Vriens; Pierre-Etienne Theveniaud; Myriam Boutami; Brendan M Finnerty; Wessel M C M Vorselaars; Inne Borel Rinkes; Rocco Bellantone; Celestino Lombardi; Thomas Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar; Laurent Bresler Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Dhaval Patel; Amit Mehta; Naris Nilubol; William Dieckmann; Karel Pacak; Electron Kebebew Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Matthew A Nazari; Jared S Rosenblum; Mark C Haigney; Douglas R Rosing; Karel Pacak Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Henrique V Luiz; Run Yu; Katherine Wolf; Ning Miao; Andrew Mannes; Karel Pacak Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 3.478