Literature DB >> 23408492

Diagnostic value of tumor markers in lung adenocarcinoma-associated cytologically negative pleural effusions.

Tsung-Cheng Hsieh1, Wen-Wei Huang, Chun-Liang Lai, Shih-Ming Tsao, Cheng-Chuan Su.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytology fails to detect neoplastic cells in approximately 40% to 50% of malignant pleural effusions (PEs), which commonly accompany lung adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic accuracy of various tumor markers in lung adenocarcinoma-associated cytologically negative pleural effusions (LAC-CNPEs) has been poor. The current study attempted to maximize diagnostic efforts in distinguishing LAC-CNPEs from benign PEs.
METHODS: PE samples were collected from 74 patients with lung adenocarcinoma with associated cytologically positive (41 patients) and negative (33 patients) PEs, and from 99 patients with benign conditions including tuberculosis (26 patients), pneumonia (28 patients), congestive heart failure (25 patients), and cirrhosis (20 patients). The authors evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity and optimal cutoff points for the tumor markers HER2/neu, CYFRA 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) to distinguish LAC-CNPEs from benign PEs.
RESULTS: Mean levels of HER2/neu, CYRFA 21-1, and CEA were found to be significantly higher in LAC-CNPEs compared with benign PEs (P = .0050, P = .0039, and P < .0001, respectively). The cutoff points for HER2/neu, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA were optimally set at 3.6 ng/mL, 60 ng/mL, and 6.0 ng/mL, respectively. Their sensitivities ranged from 12.1%, to 30.3%, to 63.6%, respectively. CEA combined with CYFRA 21-1 increased diagnostic sensitivity to 66.7%. The false-positive rates of these markers in benign PEs were 6.1%, 2.0%, and 0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CEA with CYFRA 21-1 appears to provide the best differentiation between LAC-CNPEs and benign PEs to date using 2 tumor markers, and allows for the early diagnosis and early treatment of approximately two-thirds of affected patients.
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYFRA 21-1; HER2/neu; carcinoembryonic antigen; paraneoplastic; pleural fluid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23408492     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  11 in total

1.  The value of the new scoring system for predicting neoplastic pericarditis in the patients with large pericardial effusion.

Authors:  M Szturmowicz; A Pawlak-Cieślik; A Fijałkowska; J Gątarek; A Skoczylas; M Dybowska; K Błasińska-Przerwa; R Langfort; W Tomkowski
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A fine decision tree consisted of CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 for cytological diagnosis among reactive mesothelial cells, metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung and non-lung origin in pleural effusion.

Authors:  Jinhai Yan; Qingzhu Wei; Wenjing Jian; Jianghuan Liu; Hongping Tang; Juan Ge; Jie Zhou; Tong Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Pleural fluid tumour markers in malignant pleural effusion with inconclusive cytologic results.

Authors:  L Antonangelo; R K Sales; A P Corá; M M P Acencio; L R Teixeira; F S Vargas
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Diagnostic value of tumor markers for lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion: a validation study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mei Feng; Jing Zhu; Liqun Liang; Ni Zeng; Yanqiu Wu; Chun Wan; Yongchun Shen; Fuqiang Wen
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Carcinoembryonic antigen-positive pleural effusion in early stage non-small cell lung cancer without pleural infiltration.

Authors:  Njanja Enz; Fernando Fragoso; Alexander Gamrekeli; Frank Lippek; Wolfgang Jungraithmayr
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Diagnostic Value of Six Tumor Markers for Malignant Pleural Effusion in 1,230 Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Xin Fan; Yanqing Liu; Zhigang Liang; Shanshan Wang; Jing Yang; Aihua Wu
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.874

7.  The Exploration of Peptide Biomarkers in Malignant Pleural Effusion of Lung Cancer Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Bin Xu; Chuanhao Tang; Xiaoyan Li; Haifeng Qin; Weixia Wang; Hong Wang; Zhongyuan Wang; Liangliang Li; Zhihua Li; Hongjun Gao; Kun He; Xiaoqing Liu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.434

8.  Discriminating Small-Sized (2 cm or Less), Noncalcified, Solitary Pulmonary Tuberculoma and Solid Lung Adenocarcinoma in Tuberculosis-Endemic Areas.

Authors:  Jingping Zhang; Tingting Han; Jialiang Ren; Chenwang Jin; Ming Zhang; Youmin Guo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21

9.  Diagnostic Utility of Combined CEA, CA15-3 and CA125 Biomarkers and Cytomorphology in Suspicious and Malignant Serosal Fluid.

Authors:  Zahra Rahemi; Abdolreza Javadi; Behrang Kazeminejad; Abdolali Ebrahimi; Houman Vosough; Afsoon Taghavi; Shahriar Dabiri
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2021-05-09

10.  Clinical Value of Tumor Markers for Determining Cause of Pleural Effusion.

Authors:  Yan Gu; Kan Zhai; Huan-Zhong Shi
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.