Literature DB >> 23408315

Same day discharge, surgical training and early complications after open and laparoscopic repair of primary paraumbilical hernia.

I Shaikh1, J M Willder, S Kumar.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this study were to compare same day discharges and early complications after open and laparoscopic primary paraumbilical hernia (PUH) repair, including the procedures performed by surgical trainees (STs).
METHODS: All patients who had open (suture or mesh) and laparoscopic repair of primary PUH in the Day Surgery Unit (DSU) between January 2007 and June 2009 were identified from the hospital database. The database was questioned regarding the grade of operating surgeon, type of surgical repair, day of admission and discharge from the DSU, and a patient's return to surgical services. Data were stored in Microsoft Excel(®) (TM 2007). Statistical significance was determined using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: PUH was repaired in 337 patients: 252/337 (74.8 %) had open and 85/337 (25.2 %) had laparoscopic repair. Significantly, more patients were discharged home on the day of surgery after an open repair compared to the laparoscopic repair: open repair 187/252 (74.2 %), laparoscopic repair 35/85 (41.17 %), P = 0.0001. Overall early complications such as wound complications and hospital re-visits were similar in both groups: open repair 6.3 % (16/252), laparoscopic repair 11.7 % (10/85), P = 0.1554. STs performed 142/337 (42.1 %) of the PUH repairs with similar same day discharges from the DSU: STs 64.7 % (92/142), consultant surgeons 66.7 % (130/195), P = 0.7285. The difference in hernia recurrence between open repair 7/252 (2.78 %) and laparoscopic group 0/85 was not significant (P = 0.1985).
CONCLUSION: Patients with PUH repair were more likely to go home on the day of surgery after open than after laparoscopic repair. This was not affected by the grade of the operating surgeon. Early complications were similar following open and laparoscopic repair of primary PUH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23408315     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1052-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  26 in total

1.  Comparative study between laparoscopic and open repair of paraumbilical hernia.

Authors:  I H Othman; Y H Metwally; I S Bakr; Y A Amer; M B Gaber; S A Elgohary
Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol       Date:  2012-04

2.  Training and the European Working Time Directive: a 7 year review of paediatric anaesthetic trainee caseload data.

Authors:  E Fernandez; D G Williams
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  A nationwide study on readmission, morbidity, and mortality after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.

Authors:  T Bisgaard; H Kehlet; M Bay-Nielsen; M G Iversen; J Rosenberg; L N Jørgensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias.

Authors:  P Sanjay; T D Reid; E L Davies; P J Arumugam; A Woodward
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias.

Authors:  T J White; M C Santos; J S Thompson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence.

Authors:  Linas Venclauskas; Jolita Silanskaite; Mindaugas Kiudelis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Denise E Hilling; Linetta B Koppert; Richard Keijzer; Laurents P S Stassen; I Hok Oei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.

Authors:  Ulrike Muschaweck
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Tension-free mesh repair of umbilical hernia as a day case using local anaesthesia.

Authors:  M Kurzer; P A Belsham; A E Kark
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Edward Mason; Titus Duncan; Russell Wilson; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Hajibandeh; S Hajibandeh; A Sreh; A Khan; D Subar; L Jones
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Same-Day Home Recovery for Benign Foregut Surgery.

Authors:  Swee H Teh; Samuel C Schecter; Edgar B Servais; Kingsway Liu; Jonathan Svahn; Lisa Yang; Monica Goodstein; Richard Parent; Edward Chau; Lynn Chang; Minhoa Zhou; Sharon Shiraga; Michelle Knox
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 16.681

3.  Multicenter analysis of laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair with mesh: outcomes and quality of life (QoL).

Authors:  Sharbel A Elhage; Caleb T Pflederer; Sullivan A Ayuso; Jenny M Shao; Eva B Deerenberg; David Ku; Paul D Colavita; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Reducing the pain: A cost-effectiveness analysis of transversus abdominis plane block using liposomal bupivacaine for outpatient laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Alexander L Colonna; Brandon K Bellows; Toby M Enniss; Jason B Young; Marta McCrum; Jade M Nunez; Raminder Nirula; Richard E Nelson
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-01-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.