Literature DB >> 23408103

Separation by cell size enriches for mammary stem cell repopulation activity.

Heather L Machado1, Frances S Kittrell, David Edwards, Amanda N White, Rachel L Atkinson, Jeffrey M Rosen, Daniel Medina, Michael T Lewis.   

Abstract

Mammary gland reconstitution experiments, as well as lineage tracing experiments, have provided evidence for the existence of adult mammary stem cells (MaSCs). In addition, cell sorting techniques for specific cell surface markers (CD24(+)CD29(H)CD49f(H)Sca1(-)) have been used to prospectively isolate MaSC-enriched populations. Although these markers enrich for cell subpopulations that harbor MaSCs, they do not identify regenerative stem cells uniquely. Here, we report that MaSCs can be further defined by the property of cell size. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to analyze sizing beads and further separate populations of cells with varying degrees of forward scatter (FSC). Cells with a low FSC that were approximately <10 μm in size lacked outgrowth potential and failed to reconstitute the mammary gland when transplanted into the cleared fat pads of syngeneic mice. In contrast, cells >10 μm in size with a higher FSC had increased outgrowth potential as compared with lineage-negative (LIN(-)) control cells. Limiting dilution transplantation assays indicated that the repopulating ability of LIN(-)CD24(+)CD29(H) cells that were >10 μm in size was significantly increased as compared with cells marked by CD24 and CD29 alone. These results suggest that MaSCs can be further isolated by sorting based on size/FSC. These findings have critical implications for understanding mammary gland stem cell biology, an important requisite step for understanding the etiology of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23408103      PMCID: PMC3659766          DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med        ISSN: 2157-6564            Impact factor:   6.940


  13 in total

1.  In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Gabriela Dontu; Wissam M Abdallah; Jessica M Foley; Kyle W Jackson; Michael F Clarke; Mari J Kawamura; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Development of mammary tumors from hyperplastic alveolar nodules transplanted into gland-free mammary fat pads of female C3H mice.

Authors:  K B DEOME; L J FAULKIN; H A BERN; P B BLAIR
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1959-06       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell.

Authors:  Mark Shackleton; François Vaillant; Kaylene J Simpson; John Stingl; Gordon K Smyth; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Li Wu; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Jane E Visvader
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  John Stingl; Peter Eirew; Ian Ricketson; Mark Shackleton; François Vaillant; David Choi; Haiyan I Li; Connie J Eaves
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Mammary epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  G H Smith; G Chepko
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Three division-competent, structurally-distinct cell populations contribute to murine mammary epithelial renewal.

Authors:  G Chepko; G H Smith
Journal:  Tissue Cell       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.466

7.  Steroid hormone receptor status of mouse mammary stem cells.

Authors:  Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; Mark Shackleton; John Stingl; François Vaillant; Natasha C Forrest; Connie J Eaves; Jane E Visvader; Geoffrey J Lindeman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Isolation of mouse mammary epithelial subpopulations: a comparison of leading methods.

Authors:  Matthew J Smalley; Howard Kendrick; Julie M Sheridan; Joseph L Regan; Michael D Prater; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Christine J Watson; Jane E Visvader; John Stingl
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Constitutive activation of smoothened (SMO) in mammary glands of transgenic mice leads to increased proliferation, altered differentiation and ductal dysplasia.

Authors:  Ricardo C Moraes; Xiaomei Zhang; Nikesha Harrington; Jennifer Y Fung; Meng-Fen Wu; Susan G Hilsenbeck; D Craig Allred; Michael T Lewis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Dissociation of estrogen receptor expression and in vivo stem cell activity in the mammary gland.

Authors:  Katherine E Sleeman; Howard Kendrick; David Robertson; Clare M Isacke; Alan Ashworth; Matthew J Smalley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Mammary lineage tracing: the coming of age.

Authors:  Sanja Sale; Kresimir Pavelic
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Surface acoustic wave (SAW) techniques in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Deming Jiang; Jingwen Liu; Yuxiang Pan; Liujing Zhuang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 3.  Cancer stem cells and cell size: A causal link?

Authors:  Qiuhui Li; Kiera Rycaj; Xin Chen; Dean G Tang
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 4.  Mammary stem cells and the differentiation hierarchy: current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Jane E Visvader; John Stingl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  High mitochondrial mass identifies a sub-population of stem-like cancer cells that are chemo-resistant.

Authors:  Gillian Farnie; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-13

6.  CD44+CD24+ subset of PANC-1 cells exhibits radiation resistance via decreased levels of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Pengping Li; Wei Hu; Youyou Xia; Chenxi Hu; Liang Liu; Xiaodong Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Stem Cells and Cellular Origins of Mammary Gland: Updates in Rationale, Controversies, and Cancer Relevance.

Authors:  Jiaojiao Zhou; Qishan Chen; Yiheng Zou; Shu Zheng; Yiding Chen
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.443

8.  Hallmarks of the cancer cell of origin: Comparisons with "energetic" cancer stem cells (e-CSCs).

Authors:  Federica Sotgia; Marco Fiorillo; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Dissecting tumor metabolic heterogeneity: Telomerase and large cell size metabolically define a sub-population of stem-like, mitochondrial-rich, cancer cells.

Authors:  Rebecca Lamb; Bela Ozsvari; Gloria Bonuccelli; Duncan L Smith; Richard G Pestell; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Robert B Clarke; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-08

Review 10.  Stem cell research: a novel boulevard towards improved bovine mastitis management.

Authors:  Neelesh Sharma; Dong Kee Jeong
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.580

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.