OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine if ABCB1 polymorphisms are associated with interindividual variability in sitagliptin pharmacokinetics and if atorvastatin alters the pharmacokinetic disposition of sitagliptin in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, two-phase crossover study, healthy volunteers were prospectively stratified according to ABCB1 1236/2677/3435 diplotype (n = 9, CGC/CGC; n = 10, CGC/TTT; n = 10, TTT/TTT). In one phase, participants received a single 100 mg dose of sitagliptin; in the other phase, participants received 40 mg of atorvastatin for 5 days, with a single 100 mg dose of sitagliptin administered on day 5. A 24-h pharmacokinetic study followed each sitagliptin dose, and the study phases were separated by a 14-day washout period. RESULTS:Sitagliptin pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ significantly between ABCB1 CGC/CGC, CGC/TTT, and TTT/TTT diplotype groups during the monotherapy phase. Atorvastatin administration did not significantly affect sitagliptin pharmacokinetics, with geometric mean ratios (90 % confidence intervals) for sitagliptin maximum plasma concentration, plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity, renal clearance, and fraction of sitagliptin excreted unchanged in the urine of 0.93 (0.86-1.01), 0.96 (0.91-1.01), 1.02 (0.93-1.12), and 0.98 (0.90-1.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:ABCB1 CGC/CGC, CGC/TTT, and TTT/TTT diplotypes did not influence sitagliptin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, atorvastatin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin in the setting of ABCB1 CGC/CGC, CGC/TTT, and TTT/TTT diplotypes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine if ABCB1 polymorphisms are associated with interindividual variability in sitagliptin pharmacokinetics and if atorvastatin alters the pharmacokinetic disposition of sitagliptin in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, two-phase crossover study, healthy volunteers were prospectively stratified according to ABCB1 1236/2677/3435 diplotype (n = 9, CGC/CGC; n = 10, CGC/TTT; n = 10, TTT/TTT). In one phase, participants received a single 100 mg dose of sitagliptin; in the other phase, participants received 40 mg of atorvastatin for 5 days, with a single 100 mg dose of sitagliptin administered on day 5. A 24-h pharmacokinetic study followed each sitagliptin dose, and the study phases were separated by a 14-day washout period. RESULTS:Sitagliptin pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ significantly between ABCB1 CGC/CGC, CGC/TTT, and TTT/TTT diplotype groups during the monotherapy phase. Atorvastatin administration did not significantly affect sitagliptin pharmacokinetics, with geometric mean ratios (90 % confidence intervals) for sitagliptin maximum plasma concentration, plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity, renal clearance, and fraction of sitagliptin excreted unchanged in the urine of 0.93 (0.86-1.01), 0.96 (0.91-1.01), 1.02 (0.93-1.12), and 0.98 (0.90-1.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:ABCB1 CGC/CGC, CGC/TTT, and TTT/TTT diplotypes did not influence sitagliptin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, atorvastatin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin in the setting of ABCB1 CGC/CGC, CGC/TTT, and TTT/TTT diplotypes.
Authors: R A Boyd; R H Stern; B H Stewart; X Wu; E L Reyner; E A Zegarac; E J Randinitis; L Whitfield Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: James Shepherd; Philip Barter; Rafael Carmena; Prakash Deedwania; Jean-Charles Fruchart; Steven Haffner; Judith Hsia; Andrei Breazna; John LaRosa; Scott Grundy; David Waters Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Laura M Hodges; Svetlana M Markova; Leslie W Chinn; Jason M Gow; Deanna L Kroetz; Teri E Klein; Russ B Altman Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Helen M Colhoun; D John Betteridge; Paul N Durrington; Graham A Hitman; H Andrew W Neil; Shona J Livingstone; Margaret J Thomason; Michael I Mackness; Valentine Charlton-Menys; John H Fuller Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Aug 21-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sujata Vaidyanathan; Gian Camenisch; Helmut Schuetz; Christine Reynolds; Ching-Ming Yeh; Marie-Noelle Bizot; Hans Armin Dieterich; Dan Howard; William P Dole Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Teodor T Postolache; Deborah R Medoff; Clayton H Brown; Li Juan Fang; Sanjaya K Upadhyaya; Christopher A Lowry; Michael Miller; Julie A Kreyenbuhl Journal: Pteridines Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 0.581
Authors: Rafael B R León-Cachón; Aileen-Diane Bamford; Irene Meester; Hugo Alberto Barrera-Saldaña; Magdalena Gómez-Silva; María F García Bustos Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yulia A Nasykhova; Ziravard N Tonyan; Anastasiia A Mikhailova; Maria M Danilova; Andrey S Glotov Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 5.923