P Humphrey1, P Cornes, H Al-Booz. 1. Radiotherapy Department, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK. Pauline.humphrey@uhbristol.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This quality assurance study assesses whether CT image-guided verification has led to improvements in the technique when compared with previous studies. METHODS: The CT images were studied from a cohort of 105 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer having adjuvant brachytherapy to the vaginal vault in 2010. Images were taken at first insertion, checked for air gaps and treatment delivered. Images were later transferred to the planning system and air gaps between vaginal mucosa and vaginal cylinder were measured. Comparisons were made with the 2008 results from this centre and the literature series. RESULTS: Images from two patients were not assessable owing to artefacts from hip replacements. Air gaps >2 mm were seen in 11/103 patients. Repositioning or use of a larger cylinder reduced air gaps to 7/103 patients. In total, 96/103 patients (over 93%) were able to achieve good vaginal contact throughout the treatment volume. This shows a significant improvement in applicator positioning in our centre since 2008 and also a significant improvement over the total data published in 2010 (Pearson χ(2) test=46.19; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The vaginal cylinder technique with CT imaging was proven to be effective for 96/103 patients. It is necessary to consider whether there is a better technique for the few patients with air gaps >2 mm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: For the vast majority of patients, this technique is well tolerated, without the need for analgesia, and will continue to be the first choice technique in this centre.
OBJECTIVE: This quality assurance study assesses whether CT image-guided verification has led to improvements in the technique when compared with previous studies. METHODS: The CT images were studied from a cohort of 105 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer having adjuvant brachytherapy to the vaginal vault in 2010. Images were taken at first insertion, checked for air gaps and treatment delivered. Images were later transferred to the planning system and air gaps between vaginal mucosa and vaginal cylinder were measured. Comparisons were made with the 2008 results from this centre and the literature series. RESULTS: Images from two patients were not assessable owing to artefacts from hip replacements. Air gaps >2 mm were seen in 11/103 patients. Repositioning or use of a larger cylinder reduced air gaps to 7/103 patients. In total, 96/103 patients (over 93%) were able to achieve good vaginal contact throughout the treatment volume. This shows a significant improvement in applicator positioning in our centre since 2008 and also a significant improvement over the total data published in 2010 (Pearson χ(2) test=46.19; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The vaginal cylinder technique with CT imaging was proven to be effective for 96/103 patients. It is necessary to consider whether there is a better technique for the few patients with air gaps >2 mm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: For the vast majority of patients, this technique is well tolerated, without the need for analgesia, and will continue to be the first choice technique in this centre.
Authors: Julia J Choo; Jennifer Scudiere; Pincas Bitterman; Adam Dickler; Allen M Gown; Thomas W Zusag Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: R A Nout; V T H B M Smit; H Putter; I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; J J Jobsen; L C H W Lutgens; E M van der Steen-Banasik; J W M Mens; A Slot; M C Stenfert Kroese; B N F M van Bunningen; A C Ansink; W L J van Putten; C L Creutzberg Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-03-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Matthew M Harkenrider; Alec M Block; Kaled M Alektiar; David K Gaffney; Ellen Jones; Ann Klopp; Akila N Viswanathan; William Small Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Markus Glatzer; Kari Tanderup; Angeles Rovirosa; Lars Fokdal; Claudia Ordeanu; Luca Tagliaferri; Cyrus Chargari; Vratislav Strnad; Johannes Athanasios Dimopoulos; Barbara Šegedin; Rachel Cooper; Esten Søndrol Nakken; Primoz Petric; Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik; Kristina Lössl; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Peter Niehoff; Ruth S Hermansson; Remi A Nout; Paul Martin Putora; Ludwig Plasswilm; Nikolaos Tselis Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 6.639