| Literature DB >> 23407342 |
Ali M Ardekani1, Nader Maghsudi, Anna Meyfour, Rasool Ghasemi, Niknam Lakpour, Elahe Nooshinfar, Zahra Ghaempanah.
Abstract
Stress is a threatening factor that all living organisms encounter throughout life. Depending on the type of stress, there are several mechanisms for keeping body homeostasis to minimize stress effects. Brain is an organ which shows high sensitivity to stress conditions. Although many studies have shown induced-stress effects on rat embryos, little is known about the mechanisms involved in coping with stress by female rats during pregnancy. In the present study, restraint stress method was applied because this technique has been widely used in animal models to induce both psychological and physical stress. Restraint stress was applied in regular sessions (1 and 3 hrs) in two groups of 6 pregnant Wistar rats and similar number of animals was used as control group receiving no stress. ACTH and corticosterone levels in plasma samples were shown to increase in response to stress treatments. On the last day of pregnancy, rat hippocampus from the brain of each animal in all three groups was removed and analyzed using 2 Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis (2DE) technique. Using Image Master Software, approximately 2000 proteins were detected in the 2D gels analyzed, among which 34 proteins exhibited differential expression. These results indicate that the proteome patterns from the hippocampus of pregnant rats subjected to 1 and 3 hr of stress differs significantly from the control (unstressed) group. Future mass spectrometry identification of the 34 protein spots discovered in this study should allow a more precise understanding of molecules and cellular pathways involved in stress-induced responses during pregnancy.Entities:
Keywords: 2 Dimensional gel electrophoresis; Brain; Hippocampus; Pregnancy; Proteomics; Stress
Year: 2011 PMID: 23407342 PMCID: PMC3558191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Med Biotechnol ISSN: 2008-2835
Figure 1Measurement of corticosterone hormone in three groups of pregnant rats (control-no stress, 1 hr and 3 hr stress-induced rats). Concentrations are expressed as mean±S.E.M. (as described under Materials and Methods); n=3 animals per experimental group. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated groups. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's post hoc test (*p<0.001, 1 hr stress versus control; *p<0.001, 3 hr stress versus control)
Figure 2Measurement of ACTH in three groups of pregnant rats (control-no stress, and 1 hr and 3 hr stress-induced rats). Concentrations are expressed as mean±S.E.M. (as described under Materials and Methods); n=3 animals per experimental group. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated groups. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA fol-lowed by the Tukey's post hoc test (**p<0.001, 1 hr stress versus control; *p<0.01, 3 hr stress versus control)
Figure 3A representative image of silver nitrate-stained 2DE gel from control (A), 1 hr (B), and 3 hr (C) stress-induced hippocampus rats. Proteins were separated on a pH 3-10 NL IPG strips in the first dimension and on 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel in second dimension
Volume changes for 2DE spots reflecting protein expression changes in hippocampus of 1 hr stress-induced rats compared with the control group
| Spot Number | Control%CV | 1 | Difference (fold change) | Student's t-test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3586 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 1.5 | 4.7 |
| 3722 | 6.2 | 12.0 | -2 | 10.3 |
| 3750 | 59.2 | 37.6 | 8.2 | 4.0 |
| 3755 | 32.4 | 17.6 | 3 | 5.5 |
| 3772 | 43.6 | 17.9 | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| 4079 | 15.0 | 23.3 | -1.8 | 3.9 |
| 4295 | 2.9 | 6.4 | 1.8 | 3.3 |
| 4341 | 19.5 | 17.1 | 1.7 | 3.5 |
| 4348 | 37.6 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 3.0 |
| 4474 | 8.8 | 20.5 | 1.7 | 3.4 |
| 4497 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 24.0 |
| 4515 | 13.8 | 15.8 | -1.6 | 3.6 |
| 4519 | 24.3 | 6.3 | 1.6 | 4.0 |
| 4606 | 10.0 | 45.2 | -2.2 | 4.0 |
| 4710 | 8.3 | 18.2 | -1.8 | 6.0 |
| 4797 | 12.3 | 11.7 | 4 | 8.5 |
| 4853 | 21.7 | 27.5 | -2 | 3.3 |
| 4873 | 9.6 | 12.5 | -1.5 | 4.4 |
| 4911 | 16.8 | 9.9 | -1.5 | 3.0 |
| 5018 | 9.2 | 3.2 | -1.5 | 5.8 |
| 5062 | 20.6 | 2.0 | -1.6 | 3.1 |
| 5339 | 8.8 | 4.9 | -1.5 | 5.8 |
| 5350 | 5.6 | 39.4 | -2.1 | 4.5 |
| 5389 | 5.6 | 23.0 | -1.7 | 4.8 |
| 5463 | 4.1 | 10.1 | -1.6 | 8.0 |
CV: The coefficient of variation (Coef. Variation) is the dispersion divided by the central tendency. It measures the relative variability of the spots in a match by correcting for the magnitude of the data values, thus giving a measure that has no units. The critical value for p=0.05 is 2.776. The numbers reported in this table are values above 2.77
Volume changes for 2DE spots reflecting protein expression changes in hippocampus of 3 hr stress-induced rats compared with the control group
| Spot Number | Control%CV | 3 | Difference (fold changes) | Student's t-test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 11.6 | 17.6 | -2 | 5.8 |
|
| 32.8 | 28.0 | 2.5 | 3.3 |
|
| 26.3 | 18.1 | 1.7 | 3.0 |
|
| 16.0 | 19.8 | 1.6 | 2.9 |
|
| 15.2 | 13.5 | 1.6 | 4.0 |
|
| 14.7 | 40.9 | -1.8 | 2.8 |
|
| 47.3 | 6.8 | 1.9 | 3.0 |
|
| 14.0 | - | - | - |
|
| 18.5 | 27.6 | -1.9 | 3.5 |
CV: The coefficient of variation (Coef. Variation) is the dispersion divided by the central tendency. It measures the relative variability of the spots in a match by correcting for the magnitude of the data values, thus giving a measure that has no units. The critical value for p=0.05 is 2.776. The numbers reported in this table are values above 2.77