Literature DB >> 23407253

Cost and outcome analysis of breast reconstruction paradigm shift.

Aisling M Fitzpatrick1, Lin Lin Gao, Barbara L Smith, Curtis L Cetrulo, Amy S Colwell, Jonathan M Winograd, Michael J Yaremchuk, William G Austen, Eric C Liao.   

Abstract

Increased bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer treatment has generated an increased demand for bilateral breast reconstruction. This study examines changing patterns of reconstruction over the last decade to accommodate increased case volume and decreased morbidity associated with reconstruction. A single institution series of 3171 consecutive breast reconstruction cases of more than 10 years was divided into 2 periods, that is, 1999 to 2004 and 2005 to 2010. Bilateral breast reconstruction case volume increased 260% from 1999 to 2004 (n = 237) to 2005 to 2010 (n = 634). Mean patient age at diagnosis decreased by 7 years (P < 0.001). In 2005 to 2010, autologous reconstruction decreased from 60% to 26%, implant-based reconstruction increased from 40% to 74%. There was a noted increase in single-stage implant reconstruction and selective application of perforator flaps for bilateral autologous reconstruction (P < 0.001). Two-staged tissue expander reconstruction accounted for the greatest share of total cost (45%) in the later period. A younger patient demographic and increased case volume were accommodated through increased single-staged and prosthesis-based procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23407253     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318276d979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies with 1-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Amy S Colwell
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Mastectomy versus Surveillance in BRCA Mutation Carriers with a History of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte Gamble; Laura J Havrilesky; Evan R Myers; Junzo P Chino; Scott Hollenbeck; Jennifer K Plichta; P Kelly Marcom; E Shelley Hwang; Noah D Kauff; Rachel A Greenup
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Cost analysis of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Sachin Chinta; Daniel J Koh; Nikhil Sobti; Kathryn Packowski; Nikki Rosado; William Austen; Rachel B Jimenez; Michelle Specht; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  A Predictive Model for Determining Permanent Implant Size During 2-Stage Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyle S Gabrick; Nickolay P Markov; Fouad Chouairi; Robin Wu; Sarah M Persing; Paul Abraham; Tomer Avraham; Michael Alperovich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-05-21

6.  Current Status of Breast Reconstruction in Southern China: A 15 Year, Single Institutional Experience of 20,551 Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Chen Jia-Jian; Huang Nai-Si; Xue Jing-Yan; Yang Ben-Long; Liu Guang-Yu; Di Gen-Hong; Shao Zhi-Min; Wu Jiong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Direct Hospital Cost of Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices.

Authors:  Ali A Qureshi; Kristen Broderick; Susan Funk; Nancy Reaven; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-09

8.  Avoiding Breast Animation Deformity with Pectoralis-Sparing Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Edward M Kobraei; Ryan Cauley; Michele Gadd; William G Austen; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-05-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.