A Daftary1, N Padayatchi. 1. ICAP, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. ad2254@columbia.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Escalating rates of tuberculosis-human immunodeficiency virus (TB-HIV) co-infection call for improved coordination of TB and HIV health care services in high-burden countries such as South Africa. Patient perspectives, however, are poorly understood in the context of current integration efforts. METHOD: Under a qualitative research framework, we interviewed 40 HIV-positive adult TB patients and eight key-informant health care workers across three clinics in KwaZulu-Natal Province to explore non-clinical and non-operational aspects of TB-HIV health care. FINDINGS: Qualitative analysis highlighted critical social and ethical considerations for the concurrent delivery of TB and HIV care. Co-infected patients navigating between TB and HIV programs are exposed to missed opportunities for TB and HIV service integration, fragmented or vertical care for their dual infections and contrasting experiences within TB and HIV clinics. These intersecting issues appear to affect patients' health-related decisions, particularly nondisclosure of HIV status to non-HIV health care workers and their preferences for integrated health care. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the imperative to address service fragmentation, HIV medical confidentiality and provider mistrust within the health care system, and the cultural differences associated with TB and HIV disease control.
BACKGROUND: Escalating rates of tuberculosis-human immunodeficiency virus (TB-HIV) co-infection call for improved coordination of TB and HIV health care services in high-burden countries such as South Africa. Patient perspectives, however, are poorly understood in the context of current integration efforts. METHOD: Under a qualitative research framework, we interviewed 40 HIV-positive adult TBpatients and eight key-informant health care workers across three clinics in KwaZulu-Natal Province to explore non-clinical and non-operational aspects of TB-HIV health care. FINDINGS: Qualitative analysis highlighted critical social and ethical considerations for the concurrent delivery of TB and HIV care. Co-infectedpatients navigating between TB and HIV programs are exposed to missed opportunities for TB and HIV service integration, fragmented or vertical care for their dual infections and contrasting experiences within TB and HIV clinics. These intersecting issues appear to affect patients' health-related decisions, particularly nondisclosure of HIV status to non-HIV health care workers and their preferences for integrated health care. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the imperative to address service fragmentation, HIV medical confidentiality and provider mistrust within the health care system, and the cultural differences associated with TB and HIV disease control.
Authors: Eleanor Hayes-Larson; Yael Hirsch-Moverman; Suzue Saito; Koen Frederix; Blanche Pitt; Bridget Llang Maama; Andrea A Howard Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2017-01-18
Authors: Susanne Mueller-Using; Torsten Feldt; Fred Stephen Sarfo; Kirsten Alexandra Eberhardt Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ernesha Webb Mazinyo; Lindsay Kim; Sikhethiwe Masuku; Joey L Lancaster; Ronel Odendaal; Margot Uys; Laura Jean Podewils; Martie L Van der Walt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240