Literature DB >> 2340713

Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: analogical reasoning and causal relations.

U Goswami1, A L Brown.   

Abstract

Children's performance in the classical a:b::c:d analogy task is traditionally very poor prior to the Piagetian stage of formal operations. The interpretation has been that the ability to reason about higher-order relations (the relations between the a:b and c:d parts of the analogy) is late-developing. However, an alternative possibility is that the relations used to date in the analogies are too difficult for younger children. Two experiments presented children aged 3, 4 and 6 years with a:b::c:d analogies which were based on relations of physical causality such as melting and cutting, for example chocolate bar:melted chocolate::snowman:melted snowman. Understanding of these particular causal relations is known to develop between the ages of 3 and 4 years. It was found that even 3-year-olds could solve the classical analogies if they understood the causal relations on which they were based.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2340713     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90037-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  15 in total

1.  My future self: Young children's ability to anticipate and explain future states.

Authors:  Cristina M Atance; Andrew N Meltzoff
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2005-07-01

2.  Do new caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning?

Authors:  A H Taylor; G R Hunt; F S Medina; R D Gray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Detecting temporal reversals in human locomotion.

Authors:  Paolo Viviani; Francesca Figliozzi; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Abstract analogical reasoning in high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Adam E Green; Lauren Kenworthy; Maya G Mosner; Natalie M Gallagher; Edward W Fearon; Carlos D Balhana; Benjamin E Yerys
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.216

5.  Eye movements provide insight into individual differences in children's analogical reasoning strategies.

Authors:  Ariel Starr; Michael S Vendetti; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2018-04-15

6.  Cross-cultural differences in cognitive development: attention to relations and objects.

Authors:  Megumi Kuwabara; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-06-05

7.  Deficits in analogical reasoning in adolescents with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daniel C Krawczyk; Gerri Hanten; Elisabeth A Wilde; Xiaoqi Li; Kathleen P Schnelle; Tricia L Merkley; Ana C Vasquez; Lori G Cook; Michelle McClelland; Sandra B Chapman; Harvey S Levin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Number, time, and space are not singularly represented: Evidence against a common magnitude system beyond early childhood.

Authors:  Karina Hamamouche; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

9.  Priming analogical reasoning with false memories.

Authors:  Mark L Howe; Sarah R Garner; Emma Threadgold; Linden J Ball
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

10.  Neural correlates of fluid reasoning in children and adults.

Authors:  Samantha B Wright; Bryan J Matlen; Carol L Baym; Emilio Ferrer; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.