BACKGROUND: Transcatheter balloon aortic valvuloplasty has become the first-line treatment for critical or severe aortic stenosis in neonates in many centers. Aortic regurgitation following balloon aortic valvuloplasty remains a major concern. An optimal balloon size to aortic annulus ratio in order to minimize aortic regurgitation postprocedure, while relieving the obstruction, has not yet been identified. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, data from 29 neonates with critical or severe congenital aortic valve stenosis, who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the first 28 days of life, over an 11-year period, was evaluated. The balloon size used, ranged from 71% to 160% of the annulus size, with an average of 89%, based on the aortic annulus size as measured on angiography. The aortic regurgitation immediately following the procedure was trivial in 8 (27.6%), mild in 13 (44.8%), moderate in 7 (24.1%), and severe in 1 (3.4%) patient. The balloon to annulus ratio had no statistically significant effect on the degree of aortic regurgitation immediately after the procedure (P-value of 0.25), at first follow-up within 6 weeks of the procedure (P-value of 0.76) or at follow-up at 1 year (P-value of 0.52). CONCLUSION: This study did not show any significant relationship between the balloon to annulus ratio during interventional dilatation and the degree of aortic regurgitation following the procedure.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter balloon aortic valvuloplasty has become the first-line treatment for critical or severe aortic stenosis in neonates in many centers. Aortic regurgitation following balloon aortic valvuloplasty remains a major concern. An optimal balloon size to aortic annulus ratio in order to minimize aortic regurgitation postprocedure, while relieving the obstruction, has not yet been identified. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study, data from 29 neonates with critical or severe congenital aortic valve stenosis, who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the first 28 days of life, over an 11-year period, was evaluated. The balloon size used, ranged from 71% to 160% of the annulus size, with an average of 89%, based on the aortic annulus size as measured on angiography. The aortic regurgitation immediately following the procedure was trivial in 8 (27.6%), mild in 13 (44.8%), moderate in 7 (24.1%), and severe in 1 (3.4%) patient. The balloon to annulus ratio had no statistically significant effect on the degree of aortic regurgitation immediately after the procedure (P-value of 0.25), at first follow-up within 6 weeks of the procedure (P-value of 0.76) or at follow-up at 1 year (P-value of 0.52). CONCLUSION: This study did not show any significant relationship between the balloon to annulus ratio during interventional dilatation and the degree of aortic regurgitation following the procedure.
Authors: Fatme A Charafeddine; Haytham Bou Houssein; Nadine B Kibbi; Issam M El-Rassi; Anas M Tabbakh; Mohammad S Abutaqa; Ziad F Bulbul; Nour K Younis; Mariam T Arabi; Fadi F Bitar Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Filip Tyc; Michal Galeczka; Jacek Białkowski; Katarzyna Kulig; Roland Fiszer Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 1.065