Literature DB >> 23405994

Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001-2009.

Amanda J Ampt1, Jane B Ford, Christine L Roberts, Jonathan M Morris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes in clinical practice and in the characteristics of childbearing women have the potential to influence the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). To date, little investigation has been undertaken to assess the effect of risk factor trends for the Australian population on OASIS rates. AIMS: To ascertain the OASIS rates amongst singleton vaginal births ≥37 weeks gestation in NSW, 2001 - 2009; to determine risk factor effect sizes and trends; and to compare predicted with observed OASIS rates.
METHODS: Using two linked population-based data sets, risk factors for OASIS were determined by logistic regression. Contingency tables and predictive modelling were used to determine trends and predicted rates of OASIS, respectively.
RESULTS: The OASIS rate increased from 2.2% in 2001 to 2.9% in 2009. Highest risks were for forceps deliveries without episiotomy (primiparas aOR 6.10, multiparas aOR 6.15), followed by multiparas with no previous vaginal birth (aOR 5.61). High birthweight, vacuum delivery and Asian country of birth posed risks for all women. The greatest risk factor trends were increases in Asian country of birth and vacuum delivery, while the greatest trend amongst protective factors was an increase in maternal age ≥35 years for primiparas. Predicted OASIS rates were lower than observed rates.
CONCLUSION: In an environment of changing demographic and clinical risk factors, the OASIS rate has increased. This increase is only minimally explained by the identified risk factors and may be related to other unmeasured risk factors or a possible increase in clinical ascertainment and/or documentation of OASIS.
© 2013 The Authors ANZJOG © 2013 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23405994     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  23 in total

1.  Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations.

Authors:  Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro; Gláucia M Varella Pereira; Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar; Rodrigo Leite Azevedo; Mário Dias Correia-Junior; Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Management of 3rd and 4th Degree Perineal Tears after Vaginal Birth. German Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (AWMF Registry No. 015/079, October 2014).

Authors:  T Aigmueller; W Bader; K Beilecke; K Elenskaia; A Frudinger; E Hanzal; H Helmer; H Huemer; M van der Kleyn; D Koelle; S Kropshofer; J Pfeiffer; C Reisenauer; A Tammaa; K Tamussino; W Umek
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Madhu Naidu; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in twin deliveries: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Hadar Rosen; Jon Barrett; Rania Okby; Ori Nevo; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Effect of vaginal delivery on anal sphincter function in Asian primigravida: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dakshitha Praneeth Wickramasinghe; Supun Senaratne; Hemantha Senanayake; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries and postpartum anal and urinary incontinence: a case-control trial.

Authors:  Madeline Burrell; Sapna Dilgir; Vicki Patton; Katrina Parkin; Emmanuel Karantanis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  The impact of first birth obstetric anal sphincter injury on the subsequent birth: a population-based linkage study.

Authors:  Amanda J Ampt; Christine L Roberts; Jonathan M Morris; Jane B Ford
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy use among obstetricians and midwives in Viet Nam.

Authors:  Anh T Trinh; Christine L Roberts; Amanda J Ampt
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Birth position and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a population-based study of 113 000 spontaneous births.

Authors:  Charlotte Elvander; Mia Ahlberg; Li Thies-Lagergren; Sven Cnattingius; Olof Stephansson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.