| Literature DB >> 2340539 |
L Velásquez-Jones1, F C Becerra, A Faure, M de León, H Moreno, I Maulén, A Abraham-Jalil, A Muraira.
Abstract
A clinical trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of a new oral rehydration solution (ORS) with that of the ORS recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). One hundred thirty infants with dehydration due to acute diarrhea were randomized into two groups: 68 infants received the WHO ORS containing sodium and glucose in a concentration of 90 and 111 mmol/L, respectively, and an osmolality of 311 mosm/kg (ORS-90); 62 infants received an ORS containing sodium and glucose in a concentration of 60 and 90 mmol/L, respectively, with an osmolality of 240 mosm/kg (ORS-60). Treatment failure was noted in seven infants (10.3%) in the ORS-90 group; the causes of failure were high stool output (three cases), persistent vomiting (three cases), and ileus (one case). Only one patient in the ORS-60 group (1.6%) was considered a failure because of high stool output. No significant differences were noted in the serum sodium levels in either group of patients, both in relation to the natremia seen on admittance or that seen after rehydration. A trend was observed toward correction of hypernatremia or hyponatremia with both types of ORS. A similar situation was observed with respect to the variations seen in serum potassium levels. The results from this study suggest that there may be clinical advantages of using an ORS with concentrations of sodium and glucose and a total osmolality lower than that of ORS-90, because of the lower incidence of treatment failures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1990 PMID: 2340539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ther ISSN: 0149-2918 Impact factor: 3.393