| Literature DB >> 23405016 |
Filip De Fruyt1, Barbara De Clercq, Marleen De Bolle, Bart Wille, Kristian Markon, Robert F Krueger.
Abstract
The relationships between two measures proposed to describe personality pathology, that is the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-3) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), are examined in an undergraduate sample (N = 240). The NEO inventories are general trait measures, also considered relevant to assess disordered personality, whereas the PID-5 measure is specifically designed to assess pathological personality traits, as conceptualized in the DSM-5 proposal. A structural analysis of the 25 PID-5 traits confirmed the factor structure observed in the U.S. derivation sample, with higher order factors of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. A joint factor analysis of, respectively, the NEO domains and their facets with the PID-5 traits showed that general and maladaptive traits are subsumed under an umbrella of five to six major dimensions that can be interpreted from the perspective of the five-factor model or the Personality Psychopathology Five. Implications for the assessment of personality pathology and the construction of models of psychopathology grounded in personality are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: DSM-5; FFM; NEO-PI-3; PID-5; Personality Inventory for DSM-5; Revised NEO Personality Inventory; assessment; five-factor model; general traits; personality disorders
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23405016 DOI: 10.1177/1073191113475808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Assessment ISSN: 1073-1911